# Episiotomy: Are Indian Obstetricians Getting the Angle Right?

**Authors:** Nicola Adanna Okeahialam, Abdul H. Sultan

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s13224-023-01871-8 · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India · 2023-11-28

## TL;DR

Indian obstetricians often misjudge the recommended 60° angle for episiotomy, risking anal sphincter injuries.

## Contribution

This study reveals a significant gap in knowledge and practical accuracy among Indian obstetricians regarding episiotomy angles.

## Key findings

- Only 47.9% of doctors correctly described the 60° angle, but only 2.2% accurately drew it.
- Inter-rater reliability was poor (ICC = 0.18) with a large standard error of ±12.2°.
- Only 5.8% of doctors correctly drew the angle they described.

## Abstract

A mediolateral episiotomy is recommended when indicated at a 60° angle at crowning, to avoid obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) by episiotomies angled too close or distant to the anus. This study surveyed obstetricians in India regarding the recommended episiotomy angle and their ability to correctly draw the angle.

Workshops were conducted in India to share knowledge in the prevention and repair of OASIs. A questionnaire was distributed prior to the workshop. Participants were asked to describe the recommended episiotomy angle and to draw this on a paper replica of the perineum. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the inter-rater reliability between the angle stated and drawn. A 2° difference was deemed acceptable. Standard errors of measurement (SEM) were calculated to measure the range of error of each measurement.

One hundred and forty doctors participated. 47.9% described the angle of an episiotomy to be 60°. Only 2.2% drew an angle of 60°, but 8.7% (n = 12) drew between 58 and 62°. Only 5.8% (n = 6) of doctors correctly drew the episiotomy angle they described. There was poor agreement ICC = 0.18 (− 0.01 to 0.36) with a SEM of ± 12.2°

Knowledge surrounding the recommended episiotomy angle is lacking. Doctors are failing to estimate their desired episiotomy angle. This highlights the need for national guidelines, the creation and validation of structured training programmes to improve accuracy, or using fixed-angle devices such as the EPISCISSORS-60 or other proven measurement aids to minimise preventable harm due to human error.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** OASIs (MESH:C538254)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11224165/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11224165/full.md

## References

24 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11224165/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11224165