# Identifying Bayesian optimal experiments for uncertain biochemical pathway models

**Authors:** Natalie M. Isenberg, Susan D. Mertins, Byung-Jun Yoon, Kristofer G. Reyes, Nathan M. Urban

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65196-w · Scientific Reports · 2024-07-02

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a Bayesian method to design experiments that reduce uncertainty in predicting drug effects on biochemical pathways.

## Contribution

The novel contribution is a Bayesian optimal experimental design approach for pharmacodynamic models with uncertain parameters.

## Key findings

- The method uses simulated data to account for uncertainty in hypothetical lab measurements.
- It provides probabilistic predictions of drug performance and identifies optimal experiments.
- The approach enables uncertainty quantification and guided experimental design for novel biological pathways.

## Abstract

Pharmacodynamic (PD) models are mathematical models of cellular reaction networks that include drug mechanisms of action. These models are useful for studying predictive therapeutic outcomes of novel drug therapies in silico. However, PD models are known to possess significant uncertainty with respect to constituent parameter data, leading to uncertainty in the model predictions. Furthermore, experimental data to calibrate these models is often limited or unavailable for novel pathways. In this study, we present a Bayesian optimal experimental design approach for improving PD model prediction accuracy. We then apply our method using simulated experimental data to account for uncertainty in hypothetical laboratory measurements. This leads to a probabilistic prediction of drug performance and a quantitative measure of which prospective laboratory experiment will optimally reduce prediction uncertainty in the PD model. The methods proposed here provide a way forward for uncertainty quantification and guided experimental design for models of novel biological pathways.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** PARP1 (poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1) [NCBI Gene 142] {aka ADPRT, ADPRT 1, ADPRT1, ARTD1, PARP, PARP-1}, BAX (BCL2 associated X, apoptosis regulator) [NCBI Gene 581] {aka BCL2L4}, H2AX (H2A.X variant histone) [NCBI Gene 3014] {aka H2A.X, H2A/X, H2AFX}, TP53 (tumor protein p53) [NCBI Gene 7157] {aka BCC7, BMFS5, LFS1, P53, TRP53}, BCL2L1 (BCL2 like 1) [NCBI Gene 598] {aka BCL-XL/S, BCL2L, BCLX, Bcl-X, PPP1R52}, NMI (N-myc and STAT interactor) [NCBI Gene 9111], CUX1 (cut like homeobox 1) [NCBI Gene 1523] {aka CASP, CDP, CDP/Cut, CDP1, COY1, CUTL1}
- **Diseases:** Cancer (MESH:D009369), diabetes (MESH:D003920)
- **Chemicals:** A06-76RLO (-), Talazoparib (MESH:C586365)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]
- **Cell lines:** S2 — Drosophila melanogaster (Fruit fly), Spontaneously immortalized cell line (CVCL_Z232), HCT116 — Homo sapiens (Human), Colon carcinoma, Cancer cell line (CVCL_0291)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11219779/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11219779/full.md

## References

35 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11219779/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11219779