# Perceived efficacy of case analysis as an assessment method for clinical competencies in nursing education: a mixed methods study

**Authors:** Basma Mohammed Al Yazeedi, Lina Mohamed Wali Shakman, Sheeba Elizabeth John Sunderraj, Harshita Prabhakaran, Judie Arulappan, Erna Judith Roach, Aysha Al Hashmi, Zeinab Al Azri

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02102-9 · 2024-06-28

## TL;DR

This study explores how nursing students in Oman perceive the effectiveness of case analysis as a method to assess clinical skills.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into the perceived efficacy of case analysis as an assessment method in nursing education.

## Key findings

- Most students agreed that case analysis is effective for assessing clinical competencies.
- Students preferred case analysis over multiple-choice questions as an assessment method.
- Case analysis was perceived to assess both knowledge and cognitive skills.

## Abstract

Case analysis is a dynamic and interactive teaching and learning strategy that improves critical thinking and problem-solving skills. However, there is limited evidence about its efficacy as an assessment strategy in nursing education.

This study aimed to explore nursing students’ perceived efficacy of case analysis as an assessment method for clinical competencies in nursing education.

This study used a mixed methods design. Students filled out a 13-item study-advised questionnaire, and qualitative data from the four focus groups was collected. The setting of the study was the College of Nursing at Sultan Qaboos University, Oman. Descriptive and independent t-test analysis was used for the quantitative data, and the framework analysis method was used for the qualitative data.

The descriptive analysis of 67 participants showed that the mean value of the perceived efficacy of case analysis as an assessment method was 3.20 (SD = 0.53), demonstrating an 80% agreement rate. Further analysis indicated that 78.5% of the students concurred with the acceptability of case analysis as an assessment method (mean = 3.14, SD = 0.58), and 80.3% assented its association with clinical competencies as reflected by knowledge and cognitive skills (m = 3.21, SD = 0.60). No significant difference in the perceived efficacy between students with lower and higher GPAs (t [61] = 0.05, p > 0.05) was identified Three qualitative findings were discerned: case analysis is a preferred assessment method for students when compared to MCQs, case analysis assesses students’ knowledge, and case analysis assesses students’ cognitive skills.

This study adds a potential for the case analysis to be acceptable and relevant to the clinical competencies when used as an assessment method. Future research is needed to validate the effectiveness of case analysis exams in other nursing clinical courses and examine their effects on academic and clinical performance.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-024-02102-9.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** CBT (MESH:D019292)
- **Chemicals:** MCQs (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11212368