# Genomic alteration discordance in the paired primary-recurrent ovarian cancers: based on the comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) analysis

## TL;DR

This study compares the genomic profiles of primary and recurrent ovarian cancers, finding that while some genetic features remain stable, others like gLOH scores increase in recurrent tumors.

## Contribution

The study reveals significant increases in gLOH scores and specific pathway alterations in recurrent ovarian cancer, suggesting the need for updated HRD testing strategies.

## Key findings

- Genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) scores were higher in recurrent tumors compared to primary tumors.
- Recurrent tumors showed more copy number variations and enriched alterations in TGF-beta and Hippo signaling pathways.
- Mutational signatures and driver genes were consistent between primary and recurrent tumors, aligning with HRD-related COSMI 3 signature.

## Abstract

Ovarian cancer (OC) is characterized by a high recurrence rate, and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is an important biomarker in the clinical management of OC. We investigated the differences in clinical genomic profiles between the primary and platinum-sensitive recurrent OC (PSROC), focusing on HRD status.

A total of 40 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues of primary tumors and their first platinum-sensitive recurrence from 20 OC patients were collected, and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) analysis of FoundationOne®CDx (F1CDx) was applied to explore the genetic (dis)similarities of the primary and recurrent tumors.

By comparing between paired samples, we found that genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) score had a high intra-patient correlation (r2 = 0.79) and that short variants (including TP53, BRCA1/2 and NOTCH1 mutations), tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite stability status remained stable. The frequency of (likely) pathological BRCA1/2 mutations was 30% (12/40) in all samples positively correlated with gLOH scores, but the proportion of gLOH-high status (score > 16%) was 50% (10/20) and 55% (11/20) in the primary and recurrent samples, respectively. An additional 20% (4/20) of patients needed attention, a quarter of which carried the pathological BRCA1 mutation but had a gLOH-low status (gLOH < 16%), and three-quarters had different gLOH status in primary-recurrent pairs. Furthermore, we observed the PSROC samples had higher gLOH scores (16.1 ± 9.24 vs. 19.4 ± 11.1, p = 0.007), more CNVs (36.1% vs. 15.1% of discordant genomic alternations), and significant enrichment of altered genes in TGF-beta signaling and Hippo signaling pathways (p < 0.05 for all) than their paired primaries. Lastly, mutational signature and oncodrive gene analyses showed that the computed mutational signature similarity in the primary and recurrent tumors were best matched the COSMI 3 signature (Aetiology of HRD) and had consistent candidate cancer driver genes of MSH2, NOTCH1 and MSH6.

The high genetic concordance of the short variants remains stable along OC recurrence. However, the results reveal significantly higher gLOH scores in the recurrent setting than in paired primaries, supporting further clinically instantaneity HRD assay strategy.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13048-024-01455-8.