# Differences in Volatile Organic Compounds Between Concussed and Non-concussed Division I Athletes

**Authors:** Allyn Abadie, Ian McKeag, Dan Springer, Matthew H Hale, José R Fernández

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61241 · Cureus · 2024-05-28

## TL;DR

The study found that breath acetone levels differ between concussed and non-concussed athletes, suggesting it could be a potential biomarker for concussion.

## Contribution

This study is novel in showing that breath acetone levels can differentiate concussed athletes from non-concussed ones during recovery.

## Key findings

- Breath acetone levels were significantly higher in concussed athletes compared to controls during the first week post-injury.
- Breath acetone levels decreased significantly in concussed athletes by 26 days post-injury.
- No significant differences in breath acetone were observed during exercise between non-concussed and cleared concussed athletes.

## Abstract

Introduction

Diagnosing a concussion is challenging because of complex and variable symptoms. Establishing a viable biomarker of injury may rely on physiologic measurements rather than symptomology. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as breath acetone have been identified as potential physiological markers that can capture changes in the utilization of energy substrates post-concussion. Here, we aimed to explore whether differences in VOCs exist between concussed and non-concussed athletes at the initial and later stages of injury recovery.

Methods

Six (N=6) non-concussed athletes were enrolled as control participants prior to the competitive season. Control participants’ breath acetone, heart rate, and anthropometric measures were obtained at rest and throughout a single exercise challenge by breathalyzer. Six (N=6) athletes diagnosed with concussion during the competitive season had breath acetone measured daily until cleared to return to activity or approximately four weeks following enrollment where they participated in an exit exercise challenge having breath acetone, heart rate, and anthropometric measures obtained. Comparisons were made between at-rest measures of concussed and non-concussed participants at multiple time points during the recovery period. Paired t-test comparisons with individuals serving as their own control were used to determine individual differences in recovery. Visual graphs were used to demonstrate differences in obtained measures amongst individuals and between groups during the exercise challenges.

Results

Results demonstrated statistically significant differences in breath acetone between concussed and control participants when the highest day measured during the first week of concussion was compared to the control participant’s resting values (P=0.017). Additionally, when the concussed participants served as their own control and their highest measured day of the first week post-concussion was compared to values when cleared to return to activity or at 26 days post-concussion, there was a significant difference in breath acetone (P=0.028). Comparing breath acetone during exercise between non-concussed and cleared concussed participants or four weeks post-injury, demonstrated no significant differences throughout the challenge or at rest prior. Visual graph comparisons in a single participant before and after concussion suggest differences may appear following exercise during the recovery period.

Discussion

These results suggest VOCs, particularly breath acetone, have the potential to serve as diagnostic markers of concussion. However, longitudinal research within larger cohorts and with equipment able to expel VOCs other than acetone from measures are needed to make informed recommendations.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** acetone (PubChem CID 180)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** concussion (MESH:D001924)
- **Chemicals:** VOCs (MESH:D055549), acetone (MESH:D000096)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11210574/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11210574/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11210574/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11210574