Correction to: An embarrassment of richnesses: the PFC isn’t the content NCC
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Neural dynamics and brain function · Cognitive Science and Education Research
This is a correction to: Benjamin Kozuch, An embarrassment of richnesses: the PFC isn’t the content NCC, Neuroscience of Consciousness, Volume 2024, Issue 1, 2024, niae017, https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niae017
The following changes have been made to the originally published manuscript.In section Introduction, third paragraph, second sentence, text in parentheses should read: “[…][it is a content neural correlate of consciousness (content NCC) (Chalmers 2000)][…]” instead of: “[…][it is a content NCC (Chalmers 2000)],[…]”. And later in the same sentence should read: “[…]it is just that such content can’t become conscious[…]” instead of: “[…]which is just that such content can’t become conscious[…]”.
In the fourth paragraph, end of the last sentence should read: “[…]in which case the PFC can’t be considered the content NCC for vision.” instead of: “[…]in which case the PFC can’t be considered the content neural correlate of visual consciousness (NCC) for vision.”
The emendations have been made in the article.