# Greater haemodialysis exposure (‘quotidian haemodialysis’) has different mortality associations by patient age group

**Authors:** Matthew A Roberts, Christopher E Davies, Leanne Brown, Su Jen Chua, Georgina Irish, Lukas Kairaitis, Rathika Krishnasamy, Emily See, David Semple, Nigel D Toussaint, Andrea K Viecelli, Kevan R Polkinghorne

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae103 · Clinical Kidney Journal · 2024-04-09

## TL;DR

Frequent hemodialysis may improve survival in younger patients but could increase mortality risk in those over 75.

## Contribution

Identifies age-dependent mortality associations with quotidian hemodialysis using a large registry dataset.

## Key findings

- Quotidian HD was associated with reduced mortality in younger patients.
- Patients over 75 had higher mortality with quotidian HD in the first year.
- Mortality benefit in younger patients diminished after adjusting for confounders.

## Abstract

Worldwide, most people requiring kidney replacement therapy receive haemodialysis (HD) three times per week. Greater HD time and/or frequency may improve survival, but implementation requires understanding potential benefits across the range of patients.

Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, we assessed whether quotidian HD (defined as >3 sessions/week and/or >5 h/session) was associated with reduced mortality in adult patients. The primary outcome of all-cause mortality was analysed by a time-varying Cox proportional hazards model with quotidian HD as the exposure of interest.

Of 24 138 people who received HD between 2011 and 2019, 2632 (10.9%) received quotidian HD at some stage. These patients were younger, more likely male and more likely to receive HD at home. Overall, quotidian versus standard HD was associated with a decreased risk for all-cause mortality {crude hazard ratio [HR] 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–0.56]}, but an interaction between quotidian HD and age was identified (P = .005). Stratified by age groups and splitting follow-up time where proportional hazards were violated, the corresponding HR compared with standard HD was 2.43 (95% CI 1.56–3.79) for people >75 years of age in the first year of quotidian HD, 1.52 (95% CI 0.89–2.58) for 1–3 years and 0.95 (95% CI 0.51–1.78) for ≥3 years. There was no significant survival advantage in younger people.

Although quotidian HD conferred survival benefit in crude analyses, people ≥75 years of age had greater mortality with quotidian HD than standard HD. The mortality benefit in younger people was attenuated when adjusted for known confounders.

Graphical Abstract

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11210063/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11210063/full.md

## References

21 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11210063/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11210063