The genome sequence of the Large Sharp-tail Bee, Coelioxys conoideus (Illiger,1806)
Susan C Taylor, Sally Luker, William L S Hawkes, Hongmei Li-Byarlay, Patricia Azevedo, Shannon M Hedtke

TL;DR
This paper provides the genome sequence of the Large Sharp-tail Bee, including a detailed assembly of its chromosomes and mitochondrial DNA.
Contribution
The novel contribution is the first genome assembly for Coelioxys conoideus, scaffolded into chromosomal pseudomolecules.
Findings
The genome assembly spans 417.6 megabases.
The mitochondrial genome is 20.8 kilobases in length.
Most of the genome is organized into 12 chromosomal pseudomolecules.
Abstract
We present a genome assembly from an individual female Coelioxys conoideus (the Large Sharp-tail Bee; Arthropoda; Insecta; Hymenoptera; Megachilidae). The genome sequence is 417.6 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 12 chromosomal pseudomolecules. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 20.8 kilobases in length.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5| Project accession data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Assembly identifier | iyCoeConi1.1 | |
| Species |
| |
| Specimen | iyCoeConi1 | |
| NCBI taxonomy ID | 2922063 | |
| BioProject | PRJEB55747 | |
| BioSample ID | SAMEA14448263 | |
| Isolate information | iyCoeConi1; abdomen (DNA sequencing), head and thorax (Hi-C scaffolding) | |
| Assembly metrics
|
| |
| Consensus quality (QV) | 66.1 |
|
|
| 100% |
|
| BUSCO
| C:97.3%[S:97.2%,D:0.1%],
|
|
| Percentage of assembly mapped to chromosomes | 82.24% |
|
| Sex chromosomes | - |
|
| Organelles | Mitochondrial genomes assembled |
|
| Raw data accessions | ||
| PacificBiosciences SEQUEL II | ERR10168733 | |
| Hi-C Illumina | ERR10149566 | |
| Genome assembly | ||
| Assembly accession | GCA_947623535.1 | |
|
| GCA_947623525.1 | |
| Span (Mb) | 417.6 | |
| Number of contigs | 155 | |
| Contig N50 length (Mb) | 4.9 | |
| Number of scaffolds | 58 | |
| Scaffold N50 length (Mb) | 25.9 | |
| Longest scaffold (Mb) | 41.9 | |
| INSDC accession | Name | Length (Mb) | GC% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41.88 | 40 | |
| 2 | 40.16 | 41.5 | |
| 3 | 39.81 | 41.5 | |
| 4 | 38.37 | 43 | |
| 5 | 36.91 | 37.5 | |
| 6 | 25.87 | 37 | |
| 7 | 23.35 | 39.5 | |
| 8 | 23.12 | 40.5 | |
| 9 | 21.8 | 40.5 | |
| 10 | 18.8 | 42.5 | |
| 11 | 16.89 | 38.5 | |
| 12 | 16.49 | 39.5 | |
| MT | 0.02 | 12 |
| Software tool | Version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| BlobToolKit | 4.0.7 |
|
| BUSCO | 5.3.2 |
|
| Hifiasm | 0.16.1-r375 |
|
| HiGlass | 1.11.6 |
|
| Merqury | MerquryFK |
|
| MitoHiFi | 2 |
|
| PretextView | 0.2 |
|
| purge_dups | 1.2.3 |
|
| sanger-tol/genomenote | v1.0 |
|
| sanger-tol/readmapping | 1.1.0 |
|
| YaHS | yahs-1.1.91eebc2 |
|
- —Wellcome Trust
- —Wellcome Trust
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPlant and animal studies · Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior · Insect and Pesticide Research
Species taxonomy
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Panarthropoda; Arthropoda; Mandibulata; Pancrustacea; Hexapoda; Insecta; Dicondylia; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Hymenoptera; Apocrita; Aculeata; Apoidea; Anthophila; Megachilidae; Megachilinae; Megachilini; Coelioxys, Coelioxys conoideus (Illiger,1806) (NCBI:txid2922063).
Background
Coelioxys conoidea (Illiger, 1806) is a medium-sized bee (11–15 mm), the largest of the six UK species of sharp-tailed bees (Tribe: Megachilini), with a forewing length of 7–9 mm ( Falk & Lewington, 2019). Both sexes have bright white hairs on the sides of the tergites and sternites, with interrupted hair bands present on tergites T2–T5 and sternites S2–S4. White hairs are present also on the face and sides of the thorax. The female has a cone-shaped abdomen, typical of the sharp tailed bees, with the final (6th) sternite being distinctly boat-shaped. The male has a broader abdomen, the final sternite bearing a pair of prominent, blunt teeth. For identification purposes, pictorial comparisons of UK Coelioxys spp. can be found in ( Rowson & Pavett, 2008).
Sharp-tailed bees are kleptoparasites (cuckoos) of leaf-cutter bees ( Megachile spp.) or flower bees ( Anthophora spp.), and C. conoidea are specifically kleptoparasites of Megachile maritima (Kirby, 1802). A female uses her pointed abdomen to pierce and oviposit into the cell of the host. The larva then hatches before that of the host, whereupon it consumes the food stores collected for the latter, while destroying the host egg or newly-hatched larva ( Bohart, 1970; Rowson & Pavett, 2008). In Europe, C. conoidea is known to be a kleptoparasite of M. lagopoda, which does not occur in the UK.
Coelioxys conoidea is a univoltine species, flying from June to August. The distribution in the UK follows the distribution of Megachile maritima, being mainly coastal, especially where sand dunes are present, while inland, it can be found on sandy heaths and occasionally on chalk. Adults are known to visit a wide range of flowering plants, including sea holly ( Eryngium maritimum, brambles ( Rubus spp.), knapweeds ( Centaurea spp.) and ragworts ( Jacobaea and Senecio spp.) ( BWARS, 2023; Falk & Lewington, 2019). In the UK, C. conoidea is mainly restricted to southern England and Wales, including the Channel Islands ( BWARS, 2023; Else et al., 2016; Falk & Lewington, 2019; NBN Atlas Partnership, 2023), although recent records from Nottinghamshire, Yorkshire and South Lancashire ( BWARS, 2023; Falk & Lewington, 2019; NBN Atlas Partnership, 2023) suggest a possible range expansion. It is not regarded as scarce and can be locally common ( Falk & Lewington, 2019).
On the continent C. conoidea is found throughout much of Europe and the Middle East ( GBIF Secretariat, 2022). While it is listed as a species of Least Concern on the IUCN Red List Category (Europe) ( Nieto et al., 2014; Ortiz Sánchez, 2014), in a more recent assessment, the Swedish Red List 2020 now lists C. conoidea as Critically Endangered ( SLU Artdatabanken, 2020) due to a declining population.
The genome of Coelioxys conoidea was sequenced as part of the Darwin Tree of Life Project, a collaborative effort to sequence all named eukaryotic species in the Atlantic Archipelago of Britain and Ireland. Here we present a chromosomally complete genome sequence for Coelioxys conoidea, based on one female specimen from Penhale Dunes, Cornwall.
Genome sequence report
The genome was sequenced from one female Coelioxys conoideus ( Figure 1) collected from Penhale Dunes, Cornwall (50.37, –5.12). A total of 41-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads was generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data. Manual assembly curation corrected 13 missing joins or mis-joins, reducing the scaffold number by 9.38%, and increasing the scaffold N50 by 11.35%.
Photograph of the Coelioxys conoideus (iyCoeConi1) specimen used for genome sequencing.
The final assembly has a total length of 417.6 Mb in 58 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 25.9 Mb ( Table 1). Most (82.24%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 12 chromosomal-level scaffolds. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 2– Figure 5; Table 2). While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited. The mitochondrial genome was also assembled and can be found as a contig within the multifasta file of the genome submission.
Table 1.: Genome data for Coelioxys conoideus, iyCoeConi1.1.
Genome assembly of Coelioxys conoideus, iyCoeConi1.1: metrics.The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 417,592,752 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (41,884,646 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (25,869,242 and 4,259,916 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the hymenoptera_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/iyCoeConi1.1/dataset/CANQJN01/snail.
Genome assembly of Coelioxys conoideus, iyCoeConi1.1: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot.Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/iyCoeConi1.1/dataset/CANQJN01/blob.
Genome assembly of Coelioxys conoideus, iyCoeConi1.1: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot.The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/iyCoeConi1.1/dataset/CANQJN01/cumulative.
Genome assembly of Coelioxys conoideus, iyCoeConi1.1: Hi-C contact map of the iyCoeConi1.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass.Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=HpLT1q_ASdqw_NYwF8ARig.
Table 2.: Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Coelioxys conoideus, iyCoeConi1.
The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 66.1 with k-mer completeness of 100%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.3.2 completeness of 97.3% (single = 97.2%, duplicated = 0.1%), using the hymenoptera_odb10 reference set ( n = 5,991).
Metadata for specimens, spectral estimates, sequencing runs, contaminants and pre-curation assembly statistics can be found at https://links.tol.sanger.ac.uk/species/2922063.
Methods
Sample acquisition and nucleic acid extraction
A female Coelioxys conoideus (iyCoeConi1) was collected from Penhale Dunes, Cornwall, UK (latitude 50.17, longitude –5.12) on 2021-06-30. The specimen was collected by Sue Taylor (Dipterists’ Forum) and Sally Luker (University of Exeter), using an aerial net. The specimen was identified by Will Hawkes (University of Exeter) and Sue Taylor, and was snap-frozen on dry ice.
DNA was extracted at the Tree of Life laboratory, Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI). The iyCoeConi1 sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice with tissue set aside for Hi-C sequencing. Abdomen tissue was disrupted using a Nippi Powermasher fitted with a BioMasher pestle. High molecular weight (HMW) DNA was extracted using the Qiagen MagAttract HMW DNA extraction kit. HMW DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 30. Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation using AMPure PB beads with a 1.8X ratio of beads to sample to remove the shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA sample. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.
Sequencing
Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II (HiFi) instrument. Hi-C data were also generated from head and thorax tissue of iyCoeConi1 using the Arimav2 kit and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.
Genome assembly, curation and evaluation
Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). The assembly was then scaffolded with Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) using YaHS ( Zhou et al., 2023). The assembly was checked for as described previously ( Howe et al., 2021). Manual curation was performed using HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and Pretext ( Harry, 2022). The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2022), which runs MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020) or MITOS ( Bernt et al., 2013) and uses these annotations to select the final mitochondrial contig and to ensure the general quality of the sequence.
A Hi-C map for the final assembly was produced using bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) in the Cooler file format ( Abdennur & Mirny, 2020). To assess the assembly metrics, the k-mer completeness and QV consensus quality values were calculated in Merqury ( Rhie et al., 2020). This work was done using Nextflow ( Di Tommaso et al., 2017) DSL2 pipelines “sanger-tol/readmapping” ( Surana et al., 2023a) and “sanger-tol/genomenote” ( Surana et al., 2023b). The genome was analysed within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020) and BUSCO scores ( Manni et al., 2021; Simão et al., 2015) were calculated.
Table 3 contains a list of relevant software tool versions and sources.
Wellcome Sanger Institute – Legal and Governance
The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner.
The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the ‘Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice’, which can be found in full on the Darwin Tree of Life website here. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project.
Further, the Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use. The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so we align with best practice wherever possible.
The overarching areas of consideration are:
Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the materialLegality of collection, transfer and use (national and international)
Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Abdennur N Mirny LA : Cooler: Scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(1):311–316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz 540 31290943 PMC 8205516 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Allio R Schomaker-Bastos A Romiguier J : Mito Finder: Efficient automated large‐scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 32243090 PMC 7497042 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Bernt M Donath A Jühling F : MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69(2):313–319. 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023 22982435 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Bohart GE : The evolution and parasitism among bees.Faculty Honor Lecture, Utah State University, 1970; (Accessed: 15 May 2023). Reference Source
- 5BWARS: Coelioxys conoidea. 2023; (Accessed: 15 May 2023). Reference Source
- 6Challis R Richards E Rajan J : Blob Tool Kit - Interactive Quality Assessment of Genome Assemblies. G 3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g 3.119.400908 32071071 PMC 7144090 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Cheng H Concepcion GT Feng X : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s 41592-020-01056-5 33526886 PMC 7961889 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Di Tommaso P Chatzou M Floden EW : Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(4):316–319. 10.1038/nbt.3820 28398311 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
