Correction: Deciphering the chemical bonding of the trivalent oxygen atom in oxygen doped graphene
Andoni Ugartemendia, Irene Casademont-Reig, Lili Zhao, Zuxian Zhang, Gernot Frenking, Jesus M. Ugalde, Aran Garcia-Lekue, Elisa Jimenez-Izal
TL;DR
This paper corrects a previous study on the chemical bonding of oxygen atoms in oxygen-doped graphene.
Contribution
The paper provides corrections to prior findings regarding the bonding of trivalent oxygen in graphene.
Findings
Errors in the original study's analysis of oxygen bonding were identified.
Revised interpretations of the chemical bonding in oxygen-doped graphene are presented.
Abstract
Correction for ‘Deciphering the chemical bonding of the trivalent oxygen atom in oxygen doped graphene’ by Andoni Ugartemendia et al., Chem. Sci., 2024, 15, 6151–6159, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC00142G.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras10.13039/501100002924
- —Agencia Estatal de Investigación10.13039/501100011033
- —Horizon 2020 Framework Programme10.13039/100010661
- —Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science10.13039/501100003989
- —Donostia International Physics Center10.13039/100021105
- —Barcelona Supercomputing Center10.13039/501100006433
- —Eusko Jaurlaritza10.13039/501100003086
- —Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion10.13039/501100004837
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
The authors regret an error in the affiliation of one of the authors, Aran Garcia-Lekue, in the original article. The correct affiliations are as shown in this Correction article.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.