# Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) with Small Beads for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

**Authors:** Genti Xhepa, Lucilla Violetta Sciacqua, Andrea Vanzulli, Andrea Enzo Canì, Velio Ascenti, Alexis Ricoeur, Andrea Antonio Ianniello, Agostino Inzerillo, Paolo Nicotera, Filippo Del Grande, Anna Maria Ierardi, Gianpaolo Carrafiello

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jpm14060613 · Journal of Personalized Medicine · 2024-06-08

## TL;DR

This study evaluates the effectiveness of prostate artery embolization using small beads to treat enlarged prostate in elderly patients.

## Contribution

The study provides insights into the clinical outcomes of using different bead sizes for prostate artery embolization in treating BPH.

## Key findings

- Technical success was achieved in all 24 patients undergoing PAE.
- 56% of patients successfully removed their urinary catheter after the procedure.
- No major peri-procedural complications were recorded.

## Abstract

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is the most frequent cause of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTSs) in elderly populations. Minimally invasive treatments of BPH are safe and effective and are gaining popularity among both professionals and patients. Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) has proven to be effective in Trans-Urethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) in terms of prostate volume reduction and LUTS relief. PAE entails the selective catheterization of the prostatic artery and later embolization of distal vessels with beads of various calibers. Universal consensus regarding the ideal particle size is yet to be defined. We retrospectively evaluated 24 consecutive patients (median age: 75 years; range: 59–86 years) treated with PAE at our institution from October 2015 to November 2022. Particles of different sizes were employed; 12 patients were treated with 40–120 µm particles, 5 with 100 µm, 5 with 100–300 µm and 2 with 250 µm. Technical success, defined as selective prostate artery catheterization and controlled release of embolizing beads, was achieved in all patients. Removal vs. retention of the urinary catheter at the first post-procedural urological visit was the main clinical objective. No major peri-procedural complications were recorded, with 56% of patients successfully removing the urinary catheter.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (MONDO:0010811)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** BPH (MESH:D011470), LUTSs (MESH:D059411)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11205146/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11205146/full.md

## References

58 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11205146/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11205146