# XEN45 Implant in Medically Controlled vs. Uncontrolled Eyes—Differential IOP Changes in Real-Life Conditions

## TL;DR

This study compares intraocular pressure changes after XEN45 implants in eyes with and without preoperative medication control, finding similar long-term outcomes but differing short-term IOP trends.

## Contribution

The study reveals differential IOP dynamics in medically controlled versus uncontrolled eyes following XEN45 implantation in real-life settings.

## Key findings

- XEN45 implants achieved stable IOP control in both medically controlled and uncontrolled groups without significant complications.
- The medically controlled group showed a temporary IOP increase post-surgery, returning to baseline values within a month.
- No significant differences in survival analysis were observed between the two groups.

## Abstract

Background: To assess intraocular pressure (IOP) changes and complications after XEN45 implants in medically controlled eyes (MCE) vs. medically uncontrolled eyes (MUE). Methods: A retrospective study, in a tertiary referral hospital, on mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) cases under topical medication, including 32 eyes with IOP < 21 mmHg (MCE group) and 30 eyes with IOP ≥ 21 mmHg (MUE group). The success criteria using Kaplan–Meier analysis was IOP < 21 mmHg without medications (complete success) or fewer drugs than preoperatively (qualified success) at the last visit, without new surgery or unresolved hypotony. Results: No significant preoperative differences were found between the groups. The mean IOP was 15.6 ± 3.8 mmHg in MCE and 15.1 ± 4.1 mmHg in the MUE group (p > 0.05; Mann–Whitney test) at the end of the follow-up (mean of 26.1 ± 15.6 months and 28.3 ± 15.3 months, respectively) (p = 0.414, Mann–Whitney Test). The device caused a significant IOP reduction at 24 h in both groups. Thereafter, the MCE group significantly tended to increase IOP, recovering baseline values at 1 month and maintaining them until the end of the follow-up. In contrast, in the MUE group, the IOP values tended to be similar after the first reduction. No relevant complications and no significant differences between the groups in the survival analysis were found. Conclusions: XEN45 provided stable IOP control in both the MCE and MUE group without important complications in the medium term. The IOP increasing in the MCE group, after a prior decrease, led to restored baseline values 1 month after surgery. The homeostatic mechanism that causes the rise in the IOP to baseline values and its relationship with failure cases remains to be clarified.