# Patent Foramen Ovale Occlusion in Elderly Patients: Is It Worth It? A Large, Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

## TL;DR

This study examines whether closing a patent foramen ovale is beneficial for elderly patients, finding it to be safe and effective in preventing neurological events.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence on the safety and effectiveness of PFO closure in elderly patients, a group with limited prior data.

## Key findings

- PFO closure in elderly patients was technically successful with low complication rates.
- Elderly patients had higher all-cause mortality but no recurrent strokes after PFO closure.
- New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in both elderly and younger patients post-procedure.

## Abstract

Background: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is often diagnosed in patients with cryptogenic stroke, aged > 60–65 years, but few data report the outcomes of PFO closure in elderly patients. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing PFO closure at a single institution between January 2006 and December 2011 were included. Baseline clinical features and cerebral imaging data were collected, and a RoPE score was calculated for each patient. Procedural data were recorded as well as medical therapy upon discharge. All-cause death, ischemic stroke, TIA and systemic embolism recurrence at long-term follow-up were investigated, as well as new atrial fibrillation onset. Results: Overall, 462 patients were included, of whom 64 (13.8%) were aged ≥ 65 years. Female gender was slightly more prevalent in the younger group while hypertension was more frequent among elderly patients. Previous stroke/TIA was the indication for PFO closure in 95.3% of older patients and 80.4% of younger patients, whereas other indications were more frequent among younger patients. RoPE scores were lower in older patients (median RoPE score of 5 vs. 7), and atrial septal aneurysm was more frequently detected among elderly patients. All procedures were technically successful. Procedural or in-hospital complications equally occurred in 5 (7.8%) older patients (4 AF and 1 device embolization) and 30 (7.5%) young patients (29 AF or other supraventricular arrhythmias and 1 device embolization). The follow-up duration was longer among younger patients. All-cause mortality was higher in older patients (16 deaths vs. 4 at follow-up, log-rank p < 0.001), no recurrent strokes occurred, and 2 TIAs were reported among non-elderly patients. New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in three elderly and eight young patients. Conclusions: PFO closure is a safe procedure in patients aged ≥ 65 years, associated with favorable long-term follow-up and the prevention of ischemic neurologic recurrences.