# Computer-Guided Evaluation of the Use of Two Different Devices in the Reduction of Inferior Tooth Crowding

**Authors:** Sara Di Nicolantonio, Maria Ausilia D’Angelo, Davide Pietropaoli, Annalisa Monaco, Eleonora Ortu

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14030094 · Clinics and Practice · 2024-06-20

## TL;DR

This study compares two orthodontic devices for treating lower tooth crowding in young patients and finds both are equally effective.

## Contribution

The study empirically compares elastodontic devices and clear aligners for treating inferior tooth crowding in young patients.

## Key findings

- No statistically significant difference was found between the two treatment groups at 6 months or 1 year.
- Both devices are effective for inferior expansive treatment of tooth crowding.
- Elastodontic devices are more comfortable and require less daily wear time.

## Abstract

Objective: Lower tooth crowding is considered one of the most common malocclusions in growing patients and due to the potential complications associated with it, it is recommended to intercept this condition as soon as possible. The purpose of this paper is to examine and compare the effectiveness of two different orthodontic devices (elastodontic device and clear aligners) in the treatment of anterior tooth crowding in the jaws of young patients. Materials and methods: Seventy patients aged between 10 and 16 years with anterior inferior tooth crowding were recruited into this study and divided into case and control groups. The former group comprised 35 patients (15 males and 20 females, average age 10.2 years) who were treated with elastodontic devices (EQ CP series, Eptamed), while the control group consisted of 35 patients (15 males and 20 females, average age 10.5 years) who received aligners (Invisalign). All patients underwent periodic visits after 6 months from the start of treatment (T1) and after 1 year (T2) in which the progress of therapy was evaluated by measuring the inferior intercanine distance using a digital caliper. A parametric ANOVA test was conducted for statistical analysis. Results: There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups at either T1 or T2 (p < 0.05), thus making the two treatment modalities comparable. Conclusions: Both elastodontic devices and aligners can be considered as effective tools to successfully conduct inferior expansive treatment for the resolution of tooth crowding; however, the elastodontic devices are considered more comfortable to wear and they are required to be worn for less time during the day.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Tooth Crowding (MESH:D008310)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11202813/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11202813/full.md

## References

23 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11202813/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11202813