# Community-Based View on Diagnostic Imaging at the End of COVID-19 Pandemic: Online Survey-Assisted Study

**Authors:** Nina D. Anfinogenova, Aleksandra S. Maksimova, Tatiana A. Shelkovnikova, Nadezhda I. Ryumshina, Alina D. Kuznetsova, Nazary P. Chesalov, Rostislav S. Karpov, Wladimir Y. Ussov, Alexey N. Repin

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14121269 · 2024-06-15

## TL;DR

This study explores how people's experiences and attitudes toward diagnostic imaging changed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into the relationship between pandemic history and diagnostic imaging usage patterns in the general population.

## Key findings

- Respondents with a history of COVID-19 reported higher use of CT, MRI, and ultrasound.
- Professional status and geographic location significantly influenced access to MRI and CT.
- A history of technogenic events led to overestimation of fluorography's diagnostic value.

## Abstract

(1) Background: An online survey-based observational cross-sectional study aimed at elucidating the experience and attitudes of an unstructured population regarding diagnostic imaging. (2) Methods: Invitations to participate were distributed using mixed-mode design to deidentified residents aged 18 years and older. Main outcome measures included morbidity structure and incidence of diagnostic imaging administrations. (3) Results: Respondents (n = 1069) aged 44.3 ± 14.4 years; 32.8% suffered from cardiovascular diseases (CVD); 9.5% had chronic respiratory pathology; 28.9% considered themselves healthy. Respondents with COVID-19 history (49.7%) reported higher rates of computed tomography (CT) (p < 0.0001), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (p < 0.001), and ultrasound (p < 0.05). COVID-19 history in CVD respondents shifted imaging administrations towards CT and MRI (p < 0.05). Every tenth respondent received MRI, CT, and ultrasound on a paid basis; 29.0% could not pay for diagnostic procedures; 13.1% reported unavailable MRI. Professional status significantly affected the pattern of diagnostic modalities (p < 0.05). MRI and CT availability differed between respondents in urban and rural areas (p < 0.0001). History of technogenic events predisposed responders to overestimate diagnostic value of fluorography (p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: Preparedness to future pandemics requires the development of community-based outreach programs focusing on people’s awareness regarding medical imaging safety and diagnostic value.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), CVD (MESH:D002318), respiratory pathology (MESH:D012131)

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11202513/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11202513