Temporal Course of Interference Control from Early to Late Young Adulthood: An ERP Study

TL;DR

This study explores how interference control, a cognitive ability, develops from early to late young adulthood using brain activity measurements.

Contribution

The study reveals age-related differences in neural dynamics of interference control, showing continued development into early adulthood.

Findings

Younger participants made more errors on incongruent trials compared to those in their early 30s.

Higher P2 and N2 amplitudes in early 20s suggest limited top-down control resources.

Neural dynamics of interference control continue to develop into early adulthood.

Abstract

In the present study, we aimed to investigate the neural dynamics of interference control using event-related potentials (ERPs) to reveal time course of interference control from the beginning to the end of young adulthood. Three groups of participants aged 19–21, 23–27 and 28–44 performed a Stroop task. The results revealed age differences in both accuracy and ERP amplitudes during all aspects of interreference control processing that reflect selective attention (P2), conflict monitoring (N2), conflict evaluation (P3) and interference control (N450). Both younger groups made more errors on incongruent trials compared to participants in their early 30s. The presence of higher P2 and N2 amplitudes, diminished P3 and again higher N450 amplitudes in participants in their early 20s points to a shortage of available resources for top-down control at this age. These results are in accordance with structural and functional studies that show that development of the frontoparietal network, which underlies interference control, continues after adolescence. While brain mechanisms are still developing, the use of accompanying cognitive abilities is still not optimal. The findings that change in neural dynamics and related performance continues into early adulthood challenge current models of cognitive development and call for new directions in developmental theorizing.

Figures