Using technical assistance to bridge the gap between policy, research, and implementation
Phillip L. Ealy, Crystal Tyler-Mackey, Kerri Ashurst, Misty Blue-Terry, Autumn Cano-Guin, Candi Dierenfield, Samantha Grant, Denae Harmon, Pamela B. Payne, Jennifer Wells-Marshall, Daniel F. Perkins

TL;DR
This paper describes how a government-funded center provides technical assistance to support community projects for at-risk children and families.
Contribution
The paper presents a case study of a technical assistance model that bridges policy, research, and implementation in community projects.
Findings
The PDTA Center offers targeted tools and training to federal grantees.
Technical assistance includes coaching and quality improvement through program evaluation.
Abstract
This case study on the Children, Youth, and Families At-Risk (CYFAR) Professional Development and Technical Assistance (PDTA) Center highlights a government-funded entity’s efforts to provide technical assistance to federal grantees of the CYFAR Sustainable Community Projects (SCP) grant program. The PDTA Center aligns with and supports components of an evidence-based system for innovation support. Through these components, the system provides targeted tools, training for CYFAR SCP grantees, dedicated technical assistance in the form of coaching, and quality improvement support through the evaluation of available program data.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsYouth Development and Social Support · Community Health and Development · Evaluation and Performance Assessment
