Correction to: Macroevolutionary patterns in marine hermaphroditism
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
This is a correction to: George C. Jarvis and others, Macroevolutionary patterns in marine hermaphroditism, Evolution, Volume 76, Issue 12, 1 December 2022, Pages 3014–3025, https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14639
In the originally published version of this manuscript, the authors’ in-text reporting of results underestimated the percent differences in the likelihood of hermaphroditism between internal and external fertilizers within each phylum. While the error does not affect the statistical results or the overall findings (in all phyla, internal fertilizers are more likely to be hermaphroditic than external fertilizers), amendments have been made to the values of the percentages listed in the Results section, first paragraph, third sentence which should read: “Internal fertilizers were 35, 4.4, and 2.4 times more likely to be hermaphroditic than external fertilizers for echinoderms, molluscs, and annelids, respectively (Table 3, Fig. S1)” instead of: “Internal fertilizers were 15%, 30%, and 60% more likely to be hermaphroditic than external fertilizers for annelids, echinoderms, and molluscs, respectively (Table 3).”
This error has been corrected within the article.