# Increased [68Ga]Ga-SST uptake in the uncinate pancreatic process in new digital PET/CT machine and potential association with clinical and histologic factors in NET patients

## TL;DR

This study shows that the uptake of [68Ga]Ga-SST in the uncinate pancreatic process is higher in new digital PET/CT machines and may be linked to tumor characteristics and patient gender.

## Contribution

The study reports increased and frequent [68Ga]Ga-SST uptake in the uncinate pancreatic process using digital SiPM PET/CT and identifies clinical and histological associations.

## Key findings

- Abnormal uptake in the uncinate pancreatic process was observed in 32 patients, often with suspicious NET lesions or extrinsic compression.
- SUVmax values for [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC were significantly higher than for [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and previous reports.
- UP uptake on [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC was higher in male patients and correlated with the SUVmax/mean of the primary tumor.

## Abstract

A physiological increase in the uptake of [68Ga]Ga-labeled somatostatin analogues ([68Ga]Ga-SST) PET tracers has been reported in the uncinate pancreatic process (UP) and might be even higher in latest generation of PET/CT scanners and might be falsely interpreted as NET. We aimed to investigate the uptake of UP in a large population of NET patients who underwent [68Ga]Ga-SST PET/CT with digital SiPM detectors. We also explored potential associations between UP uptake and various clinical, imaging, and pathological factors routinely assessed in NET patients.

We analyzed all consecutive NET patients from July 2018 to June 2022 in this retrospective, single-center study. All patients underwent a [68Ga]Ga-SST PET/CT scan on a digital SiPM PET/CT scanner. On visual analysis, we distinguished between normal linear and homogenous UP uptake or abnormal if otherwise. We compared SUVmax/mean in patients with normal UP uptake to those with abnormal UP uptake with suspicious NET lesions on contrast-enhanced CT (ce-CT) and according to the site of the primary NET (pancreatic NET vs. other), patient gender (female vs. male) and tumor grade (grade 1–2 vs. 3) using a Mann–Whitney test. We also assessed the correlation between SUVmax/mean values in UP with patients’ age, primary NET Ki-67 counting, and its SUVmax/mean, TLA and MTV values.

We included 131 NET patients with a total of 34 [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and 113 [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scans. An abnormal UP uptake was seen in 32 patients with 65.7% of suspicious NET lesion or extrinsic compression on morphological imaging. Normal UP uptake SUVmax/mean were measured in 115 [68Ga]Ga-SST scans (78.2%) with normal UP uptake and without suspicious lesion on morphological imaging. We found an average SUVmax of 12.3 ± 4.1 for [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and 19.8 ± 9.8 g/ml for [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC, hence higher than those reported in the literature [SUVmax 5 ± 1.6 to 12.6 ± 2.2 g/ml] with significant difference with abnormal UP uptake and between both PET tracers (both p < 0.01). Significant results were a higher UP uptake on [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC in male patients (p = 0.02) and significant associations between UP uptake on [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC and SUVmax/mean of the primary tumor (ρ [0.337–0.363]; p [0.01–0.02]).

We confirmed a higher and very frequent UP uptake in latest SiPM-detector [68Ga]Ga-SST PET/CT with an even higher uptake in patients that had [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. SUVmean/max were significantly higher in abnormal UP uptake but there were overlaps with UP SUV values for both [68Ga]Ga-SST and a correlation to morphological imaging is crucial. Besides, significant associations between UP uptake and SUVmean/max of the primary NET as well as patients’ gender were seen in the larger cohort of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC patients suggesting that both physiological and pathological parameters could affect UP uptake.