# Implementation and Outcomes of Multidisciplinary Diabetes Management Program Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Comparative Study

## TL;DR

A multidisciplinary diabetes management program improved blood sugar control in type 2 diabetes patients compared to traditional physician-led care after one year.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the real-world implementation and outcomes of a multidisciplinary diabetes program in Saudi Arabia.

## Key findings

- The DMP achieved better glycemic control (HbA1c <7%) than physician-led care.
- Lipid control (LDL-c <70 mg/dl) was similar between the two care models.
- Implementation of the DMP was incomplete in areas like nutrition and foot care.

## Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend shifting physician-led care (PLC) for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to more effective multidisciplinary health care (MHC). However, few researchers have studied its real-life implementation in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, we aimed to assess the implementation and compare the outcomes of an MDC diabetes management program (DMP) among T2DM patients to a PLC at a general hospital after one year of follow-up in a real-world practice setting.

Methods: We conducted this comparative patient files review study by analyzing medical records of all T2DM patients at two private care centers. Both were compared for their effectiveness in achieving two outcomes: the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7% and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) <70 mg/dl at the end of the first year. Additionally, we assessed the implementation of the DMP.

Results: Eight hundred thirty-four medical records were reviewed, 537 from DMP, and 279 from the PLC center. The personal health coordination was almost complete (97.8%) in the DMP, but the implementation was incomplete regarding nutrition (65.7%), dental exam (64.8%), and foot care (58.3%). Both care groups were matched for age (p = 0.056), gender (p = 0.085), duration of diabetes (p = 0.217), and basal glycemic control (p = 0.171). The DMP showed a significant net decrease in HbA1c (-0.5 [IQR 1.47%] vs -0.2 [IQR 3.05%], p = 0.0001) and LDL-c (-10 [IQR 50] vs -5 [IQR 60.5] mg/dl, p = 0.004) compared to PLC. A higher percentage of patients achieved glycemic control in the DMP than in the PLC (49.4% vs 38.7%, p = 0.038). However, both programs demonstrated similar outcomes in lipid control (28.7% vs. 30%, p = 0.695).

Conclusion: Despite some gaps in implementation, one year of DMP showed better glycemic control among T2DM patients compared to PLC. Both programs were comparable in terms of lipid control. Further studies identifying the gaps in care implementation could improve sustainability, future replication, and generalizability of similar programs to other healthcare systems in Saudi Arabia.