Meeting medical emergency response criteria for hypertension is not associated with an increased likelihood of in-hospital mortality in a tertiary referral center
Jin Nuo Joan Tsang, Stephen Bacchi, Christopher D. Ovenden, Rudy Goh, Joshua G. Kovoor, Aashray K. Gupta, Yong Min Le, Antoinette Lam, Brandon Stretton, Minh-Son To, Richard Woodman, Arduino A Mangoni, James Malycha

TL;DR
High blood pressure alone does not increase the risk of in-hospital death for patients meeting medical emergency team criteria.
Contribution
The study reveals that hypertension as a MET criterion is not significantly linked to in-hospital mortality.
Findings
4282 out of 15,734 admissions met MET criteria, with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.05 for in-hospital mortality.
Respiratory rate ≤7 had the highest positive likelihood ratio (9.83) for mortality, while systolic pressure ≥200 mmHg had a non-significant LR of 1.26.
Hypertension as a MET criterion was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality.
Abstract
Rapid response team or medical emergency team (MET) calls are typically activated by significant alterations of vital signs in inpatients. However, the clinical significance of a specific criterion, blood pressure elevations, is uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the likelihood ratios associated with MET-activating vital signs, particularly in-patient hypertension, for predicting in-hospital mortality among general medicine inpatients who met MET criteria at any point during admission in a South Australian metropolitan teaching hospital. Among the 15,734 admissions over a two-year period, 4282 (27.2%) met any MET criteria, with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.05 (95% CI 2.93 to 3.18) for in-hospital mortality. Individual MET criteria were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality, with the highest positive likelihood ratio for respiratory rate ≤ 7 breaths per…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
