# Fostering student authorship skills in synthetic biology

## TL;DR

This paper presents a project-based learning approach to teach scientific writing and publishing to undergraduates in synthetic biology, aiming to improve STEM retention among underrepresented groups.

## Contribution

The study introduces a new educational framework combining project-based learning with a revised assessment tool to enhance scientific writing and peer review skills.

## Key findings

- The project-based approach effectively achieved learning objectives in scientific writing and peer review.
- Students reported high satisfaction and self-reported learning gains from the course.
- The revised SAAB inventory successfully measured learning outcomes related to authorship and publishing.

## Abstract

Women and racial minorities are underrepresented in the synthetic biology community. Developing a scholarly identity by engaging in a scientific community through writing and communication is an important component for STEM retention, particularly for underrepresented individuals. Several excellent pedagogical tools have been developed to teach scientific literacy and to measure competency in reading and interpreting scientific literature. However, fewer tools exist to measure learning gains with respect to writing, or that teach the more abstract processes of peer review and scientific publishing, which are essential for developing scholarly identity and publication currency. Here we describe our approach to teaching scientific writing and publishing to undergraduate students within a synthetic biology course. Using gold standard practices in project-based learning, we created a writing project in which students became experts in a specific application area of synthetic biology with relevance to an important global problem or challenge. To measure learning gains associated with our learning outcomes, we adapted and expanded the Student Attitudes, Abilities, and Beliefs (SAAB) concept inventory to include additional questions about the process of scientific writing, authorship, and peer review. Our results suggest the project-based approach was effective in achieving the learning objectives with respect to writing and peer reviewed publication, and resulted in high student satisfaction and student self-reported learning gains. We propose that these educational practices could contribute directly to the development of scientific identity of undergraduate students as synthetic biologists, and will be useful in creating a more diverse synthetic biology research enterprise.