# Cost-effectiveness analysis of Anaprazole versus Ilaprazole for the treatment of duodenal ulcers in China

**Authors:** Huitong Ni, Jiaqi Shi, Ming Hu, Naitong Zhou, Shu Yang

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1407435 · 2024-06-07

## TL;DR

This study compares the cost-effectiveness of Anaprazole and Ilaprazole for treating duodenal ulcers in China, finding Anaprazole to be similarly effective and safer at a lower cost.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel cost-effectiveness analysis of Anaprazole compared to Ilaprazole for duodenal ulcers in the Chinese healthcare context.

## Key findings

- Anaprazole and Ilaprazole showed similar efficacy and safety in treating duodenal ulcers.
- Anaprazole was found to be cost-effective with an ICUR of 2,995.41¥/QALY.
- The drug imposed a low budgetary impact on the Chinese healthcare system.

## Abstract

Anaprazole, an innovative drug, has shown promise in initial clinical trials for patients with duodenal ulcers (DU) in China. This study aimed to evaluate the potential effects, safety, and cost-effectiveness of Anaprazole compared to Ilaprazole in the treatment of DU and the budgetary impact on the healthcare system.

Two multicentre, randomized controlled trials were used as data sources. The efficacy and safety of Anaprazole and Ilaprazole were compared using an anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). A cost-utility analysis (CUA) was performed using a Markov model. A budget impact analysis (BIA) was conducted to evaluate the impact on the expenditure of the Chinese healthcare system. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken to test the uncertainty.

The study findings indicated that Anaprazole and Ilaprazole have similar efficacy and safety in treating DU (OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.94–1.01; p = 0.35; OR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.39–1.08; p = 0.12). The ICUR was 2,995.41¥/QALY, which is below the WTP threshold. The CUA results showed that Anaprazole is a cost-effective intervention with a probability of 85% at a given threshold. The results demonstrated strong robustness in the sensitivity analysis. Anaprazole imposed a low burden on the Chinese healthcare budget in the BIA.

Compared with Ilaprazole, Anaprazole has similar efficacy, safety, and high cost-effectiveness, while also impacting the total expenditure of the healthcare system.

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04215653 and NCT02847455

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** DU (MESH:D004381)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11190298/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11190298