The genome sequence of the White-backed Marble, Hedya salicella (Linnaeus, 1758)
Douglas Boyes, Zoe Goate, Thiago Mafra Batista, Leonardo Barbosa Koerich, Jose Ramon Pardos-Blas, Xiangyu Hao

TL;DR
This paper presents the genome sequence of the White-backed Marble moth, including a detailed assembly and gene annotation.
Contribution
The study provides a high-quality genome assembly and gene annotation for the White-backed Marble moth.
Findings
The genome assembly spans 742.3 megabases and includes 25 chromosomal pseudomolecules.
Gene annotation identified 11,961 protein coding genes using Ensembl.
The mitochondrial genome is 16.3 kilobases in length and was also assembled.
Abstract
We present a genome assembly from an individual male Hedya salicella (the White-backed Marble; Arthropoda; Insecta; Lepidoptera; Tortricidae). The genome sequence is 742.3 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 25 chromosomal pseudomolecules, including the Z sex chromosome. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 16.3 kilobases in length. Gene annotation of this assembly on Ensembl identified 11,961 protein coding genes.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5| Project accession data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Assembly identifier | ilHedSali1.2 | |
| Species |
| |
| Specimen | ilHedSali1 | |
| NCBI taxonomy ID | 1869985 | |
| BioProject | PRJEB43799 | |
| BioSample ID | SAMEA7520688 | |
| Isolate information | ilHedSali1, male (whole organism) | |
| Assembly metrics
|
| |
| Consensus quality (QV) | 56 |
|
|
| 99.99% |
|
| BUSCO
| C:98.2%[S:97.9%,D:0.3%],
|
|
| Percentage of assembly mapped to chromosomes | 99.88% |
|
| Sex chromosomes | Z chromosome |
|
| Organelles | Mitochondrial genome assembled |
|
| Raw data accessions | ||
| PacificBiosciences SEQUEL II | ERR6436368 | |
| 10X Genomics Illumina | ERR6054622–ERR6054625 | |
| Hi-C Illumina | ERR6054619, ERR6054620, ERR6054621 | |
| Genome assembly | ||
| Assembly accession | GCA_905404275.2 | |
|
| GCA_905404235.2 | |
| Span (Mb) | 742.3 | |
| Number of contigs | 60 | |
| Contig N50 length (Mb) | 25.6 | |
| Number of scaffolds | 45 | |
| Scaffold N50 length (Mb) | 27.3 | |
| Longest scaffold (Mb) | 128.9 | |
| Genome annotation | ||
| Number of protein-coding genes | 11,961 | |
| Number of non-coding genes | 1,706 | |
| Number of gene transcripts | 20,143 | |
| INSDC accession | Chromosome | Size (Mb) | GC% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.61 | 37.5 | |
| 2 | 45.12 | 37.3 | |
| 3 | 41.55 | 37.7 | |
| 4 | 28.87 | 37.3 | |
| 5 | 28.41 | 37.3 | |
| 6 | 27.72 | 37.5 | |
| 7 | 27.28 | 38 | |
| 8 | 27.07 | 37.6 | |
| 9 | 26.26 | 37.5 | |
| 10 | 25.55 | 37.7 | |
| 11 | 25.49 | 37.6 | |
| 12 | 25.43 | 37.6 | |
| 13 | 24.05 | 37.5 | |
| 14 | 23.77 | 37.7 | |
| 15 | 23.63 | 38 | |
| 16 | 23.06 | 37.9 | |
| 17 | 22.87 | 38.2 | |
| 18 | 21.1 | 37.9 | |
| 19 | 18.48 | 38 | |
| 20 | 17.84 | 38.4 | |
| 21 | 15.95 | 37.7 | |
| 22 | 15.76 | 38.2 | |
| 23 | 12.43 | 38.3 | |
| 24 | 12.34 | 38.6 | |
| Z | 128.85 | 37 | |
| MT | 0.02 | 18.2 | |
| - | unplaced | 0.84 | 45.2 |
| Software tool | Version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| BlobToolKit | 4.0.7 |
|
| BUSCO | 5.3.2 |
|
| FreeBayes | 1.3.1-17-gaa2ace8 |
|
| gEVAL | N/A |
|
| Hifiasm | 0.12 |
|
| HiGlass | 1.11.6 |
|
| Long Ranger ALIGN | 2.2.2 |
|
| Merqury | MerquryFK |
|
| MitoHiFi | 2 |
|
| PretextView | 0.2 |
|
| purge_dups | 1.2.3 |
|
| SALSA | 2.2 |
|
| sanger-tol/genomenote | v1.0 |
|
| sanger-tol/readmapping | 1.1.0 |
|
- —Wellcome Trust
- —Wellcome Trust
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Chromosomal and Genetic Variations · Genetic diversity and population structure
Species taxonomy
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Ecdysozoa; Arthropoda; Hexapoda; Insecta; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Lepidoptera; Glossata; Ditrysia; Tortricoidea; Tortricidae; Olethreutinae; Olethreutini; Hedya; Hedya salicella (Linnaeus, 1758) (NCBI:txid1869985).
Background
The White-backed Marble, Heyda salicella (Linnaeus, 1758) is a single brooded, common species of micro moth widely distributed across Europe and introduced in North America ( Gilligan et al., 2020). This large and distinctive Heyda species is predominantly white with a mottled chestnut and grey thorax. It has a wingspan of 19–24 mm and has been recorded in flight from the months June through to September. H. salicella inhabits areas where food plants are abundant, with sightings recorded in marshy areas amongst willows, banks of streams, open woodland and occasionally parks and gardens. Larvae feed on spun shoots and folded leaves of Salix (willow, sallow) and Populus (poplar, aspen) species ( Kimber, 2023).
The genome of H. salicella was sequenced as part of the Darwin Tree of Life Project, a collaborative effort to sequence all named eukaryotic species in the Atlantic Archipelago of Britain and Ireland. Here we present a complete chromosome-level genome sequence for H. salicella, based on one male specimen from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire, UK. This high-quality complete genome assembly of H. salicella, among a phylogenetically diverse set of insect orders, will yield genomes from closely related species, permitting valuable insights into genomic change over shorter time frames ( Mulhair & Holland, 2022), while resolving the biogeographic origin of morphologically similar populations in Europe and North America.
Genome sequence report
The genome was sequenced from one male Hedya salicella ( Figure 1) collected from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire, UK (latitude 51.77, longitude –1.34). A total of 25-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads and 43-fold coverage in 10X Genomics read clouds were generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data. Manual assembly curation corrected four missing joins or mis-joins and removed one haplotypic duplication, reducing the scaffold number by 16.67%.
Photograph of the Hedya salicella (ilHedSali1) specimen used for genome sequencing.
The final assembly has a total length of 742.3 Mb in 45 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 27.3 Mb ( Table 1). Most (99.88%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 25 chromosomal-level scaffolds, representing 24 autosomes and the Z sex chromosome. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 2– Figure 5; Table 2). While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited. The mitochondrial genome was also assembled and can be found as a contig within the multifasta file of the genome submission.
Table 1.: Genome data for Hedya salicella, ilHedSali1.2.
Genome assembly of Hedya salicella, ilHedSali1.2: metrics.The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 742,325,546 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (128,845,201 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (27,275,373 and 17,835,027 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the lepidoptera_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilHedSali1.2/dataset/CAJQFL02.1/snail.
Genome assembly of Hedya salicella, ilHedSali1.2: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot.Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilHedSali1.2/dataset/CAJQFL02.1/blob.
Genome assembly of Hedya salicella, ilHedSali1.2: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot.The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilHedSali1.2/dataset/CAJQFL02.1/cumulative.
Genome assembly of Hedya salicella, ilHedSali1.2: Hi-C contact map of the ilHedSali1.2 assembly, visualised using HiGlass.Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=dVzSopIPQm2BTrcTNwkrZw.
Table 2.: Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Hedya salicella, ilHedSali1.
The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 56 with k-mer completeness of 99.99%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.3.2 completeness of 98.2% (single = 97.9%, duplicated = 0.3%), using the lepidoptera_odb10 reference set ( n = 5,286).
Metadata for specimens, spectral estimates, sequencing runs, contaminants and pre-curation assembly statistics can be found at https://links.tol.sanger.ac.uk/species/1869985.
Genome annotation report
The ilHedSali1.2, GCA_905404275.2 genome assembly was annotated using the Ensembl rapid annotation pipeline ( Table 1; https://rapid.ensembl.org/Hedya_salicella_GCA_905404275.2/Info/Index). The resulting annotation includes 20,143 transcribed mRNAs from 11,961 protein-coding and 1,706 non-coding genes.
Methods
Sample acquisition and nucleic acid extraction
A male Hedya salicella (specimen no. Ox000472, individual ilHedSali1) was collected from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire (biological vice-county: Berkshire), UK (latitude 51.77, longitude –1.34) on 13 June 2020. The specimen was taken from woodland by Douglas Boyes (University of Oxford) using a light trap. The specimen was identified by the collector, and preserved on dry ice.
DNA was extracted at the Tree of Life laboratory, Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI). The ilHedSali1 sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice with tissue set aside for Hi-C sequencing. Whole organism tissue was disrupted using a Nippi Powermasher fitted with a BioMasher pestle. High molecular weight (HMW) DNA was extracted using the Qiagen MagAttract HMW DNA extraction kit. Low molecular weight DNA was removed from a 20 ng aliquot of extracted DNA using the 0.8X AMpure XP purification kit prior to 10X Chromium sequencing; a minimum of 50 ng DNA was submitted for 10X sequencing. HMW DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 30. Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation using AMPure PB beads with a 1.8X ratio of beads to sample to remove the shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA sample. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.
Sequencing
Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus and 10X Genomics read cloud DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II (HiFi) and HiSeq X Ten (10X) instruments. Hi-C data were also generated from tissue of ilHedSali1 using the Arima2 kit and sequenced on the HiSeq X Ten instrument.
Genome assembly, curation and evaluation
Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). One round of polishing was performed by aligning 10X Genomics read data to the assembly with Long Ranger ALIGN, calling variants with FreeBayes ( Garrison & Marth, 2012). The assembly was then scaffolded with Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) using SALSA2 ( Ghurye et al., 2019). The assembly was checked for contamination and corrected using the gEVAL system ( Chow et al., 2016) as described previously ( Howe et al., 2021). Manual curation was performed using gEVAL, HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and Pretext ( Harry, 2022). The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2022), which runs MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020) or MITOS ( Bernt et al., 2013) and uses these annotations to select the final mitochondrial contig and to ensure the general quality of the sequence.
A Hi-C map for the final assembly was produced using bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) in the Cooler file format ( Abdennur & Mirny, 2020). To assess the assembly metrics, the k-mer completeness and QV consensus quality values were calculated in Merqury ( Rhie et al., 2020). This work was done using Nextflow ( Di Tommaso et al., 2017) DSL2 pipelines “sanger-tol/readmapping” ( Surana et al., 2023a) and “sanger-tol/genomenote” ( Surana et al., 2023b). The genome was analysed within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020) and BUSCO scores ( Manni et al., 2021; Simão et al., 2015) were calculated.
Table 3 contains a list of relevant software tool versions and sources.
Genome annotation
The Ensembl gene annotation system ( Aken et al., 2016) was used to generate annotation for the Hedya salicella assembly (ilHedSali1.2, GCA_905404275.2). Annotation was created primarily through alignment of transcriptomic data to the genome, with gap filling via protein-to-genome alignments of a select set of proteins from UniProt ( UniProt Consortium, 2019).
Ethics and compliance issues
The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner. The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project. Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Abdennur N Mirny LA : Cooler: Scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(1):311–316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz 540 31290943 PMC 8205516 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Aken BL Ayling S Barrell D : The Ensembl gene annotation system. Database (Oxford). 2016;2016:baw 093. 10.1093/database/baw 093 27337980 PMC 4919035 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Allio R Schomaker-Bastos A Romiguier J : Mito Finder: Efficient automated large‐scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 32243090 PMC 7497042 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Bernt M Donath A Jühling F : MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69(2):313–9. 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023 22982435 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Challis R Richards E Rajan J : Blob Tool Kit - interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G 3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g 3.119.400908 32071071 PMC 7144090 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Cheng H Concepcion GT Feng X : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s 41592-020-01056-5 33526886 PMC 7961889 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Chow W Brugger K Caccamo M : g EVAL — a web-based browser for evaluating genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(16):2508–10. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw 159 27153597 PMC 4978925 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Di Tommaso P Chatzou M Floden EW : Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(4):316–319. 10.1038/nbt.3820 28398311 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
