# Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Case Report of a Dreaded Complication of an Insidious Disease

## TL;DR

A 71-year-old woman with multiple chronic conditions died from a perforated peptic ulcer, highlighting the challenges in diagnosing and treating this serious complication.

## Contribution

This case report emphasizes the diagnostic and management challenges of perforated peptic ulcers in medically complex patients.

## Key findings

- Perforated peptic ulcers can be fatal despite immediate surgical intervention in patients with complex medical histories.
- Symptoms of perforated ulcers may be masked by comorbidities, leading to delayed diagnosis.
- Older females are increasingly affected, requiring heightened clinical awareness.

## Abstract

Perforated peptic ulcers, though relatively rare, represent critical surgical emergencies with potentially life-threatening consequences. Their significance lies not only in their acute presentation but also in the diagnostic challenges they pose, particularly in patients with complex medical histories.

Here we present a case of a 71-year-old female with a complex medical history, including insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, dementia, diverticulitis, and chronic back pain, who initially were unresponsive and cyanotic. Despite challenges in diagnosis due to her medical complexity and opioid use, she was ultimately diagnosed with a perforated duodenal ulcer. Tragically, despite immediate surgical intervention, she succumbed to her illness, highlighting the complexities involved in managing perforated peptic ulcers, especially in patients with multiple chronic medical conditions.

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) can often remain asymptomatic, leading to delayed diagnosis and potentially life-threatening complications like perforation. Mortality rates associated with perforated peptic ulcers vary widely, ranging from 1.3% to 20%, with risk factors including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, Helicobacter pylori infection, smoking, and corticosteroid use. Diagnosis necessitates a high index of suspicion, thorough clinical examination, and imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) scans with oral contrast.

Treatment strategies range from nonoperative management with intravenous (IV) histamine H2-receptor blockers or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to surgical intervention, depending on the patient's hemodynamic stability. However, the case presented underscores the challenges in timely diagnosis and intervention, particularly in patients with complex medical histories, where symptoms may be masked or attributed to other comorbidities.

Recent studies indicate a demographic shift toward older age and a higher prevalence among females, emphasizing the importance of increased awareness and vigilance among healthcare providers. Early recognition of symptoms, prompt investigation, and interdisciplinary collaboration are crucial in optimizing outcomes for patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers, especially in the context of their underlying medical conditions.