Corrigendum: Automated screening devices for vision screening in preschool children: a comparison of the PlusoptiX S12C photoscreener and retinomax K+3 autorefractor
Stephen C. Hunter, Donny W. Suh, Iliana Molina, Jennifer Espinoza
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRetinopathy of Prematurity Studies
In the published article, there was an error in the author list, and authors Iliana Molina and Jennifer Espinoza were erroneously excluded. The corrected author list appears below.
Stephen C. Hunter^1*^, Donny W. Suh^2^, Iliana Molina^2^ and Jennifer Espinoza^2^
^1^ University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, United States
^2^ Department of Ophthalmology, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, United States
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
In the published article, there was an error. The Author Contributions and Acknowledgements sections contained incorrect information and have been updated to reflect the recognition of Iliana Molina and Jennifer Espinoza as authors.
A correction has been made to the Acknowledgements section. The section previously read:
“The authors wish to thank Iliana Molina and Jennifer Espinoza for their assistance with data acquisition, data processing, and for their contributions to the UCI EyeMobile for Children program”.
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The authors wish to thank the UCI EyeMobile for Children program for providing valuable vision screening services to children and supporting this research”.
A correction has been made to the Author Contributions section. The section previously read:
“SH and DS designed the study. SH analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. SH and DS reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version”.
The corrected sentence appears below:
“SH, DS, IM, and JE designed the study. SH, IM, and JE executed the study and acquired subject data. SH analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. SH and DS reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version”.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.