Avelumab first-line maintenance treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: real-world results from a Korean expanded access program
Se Hoon Park, Sang Joon Shin, Sun Young Rha, Seung-Hoon Beom, Ho Kyung Seo, Bhumsuk Keam, Miso Kim, Yoon-Hee Hong, Shinkyo Yoon, Jae-Lyun Lee

TL;DR
This study shows that avelumab is effective and safe as first-line maintenance treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma in Korean patients, based on real-world data from an expanded access program.
Contribution
The study provides the first real-world evidence of avelumab's effectiveness and safety in Korean patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Findings
Median progression-free survival was 7.9 months with avelumab treatment.
Adverse events occurred in 70% of patients, with only 10% experiencing grade ≥3 or serious events.
Thirty percent of patients received avelumab for more than 12 months.
Abstract
The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of avelumab administered as first-line (1L) maintenance treatment in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) without disease progression after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. This study provides the first real-world data from Korea regarding avelumab 1L maintenance treatment, comprising data obtained from a nationwide expanded access program (EAP). This open-label EAP was conducted at five centers from September 2021 until June 2023. Eligible patients had unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC and were progression free after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks per local prescribing information. Safety and effectiveness were assessed by treating physicians according to routine practice. Overall, 30 patients were enrolled. At initial UC…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComparative constitutional jurisprudence studies · Digitalization, Law, and Regulation · Criminal Justice and Penology
