The influence of scaffolding on intrinsic motivation and autonomous adherence to a game-based, unsupervised home rehabilitation program for people with upper extremity hemiparesis due to stroke. A randomized controlled trial

TL;DR

This study tested a home-based game system for stroke patients to improve arm function and found that it worked well without needing extra support.

Contribution

It shows that unsupervised, game-based rehabilitation can be effective for stroke recovery.

Findings

Both groups showed significant improvements in motor function over 12 weeks.

Scaffolding had no significant effect on adherence or motor outcomes.

21 participants achieved clinically meaningful improvements in UEFMA scores.

Abstract

This parallel, randomized controlled trial examines intrinsic motivation, adherence and motor function improvement demonstrated by two groups of subjects that performed a twelve-week, home-based upper extremity rehabilitation program. Seventeen subjects played games presenting eight to twelve discrete levels of increasing difficulty. Sixteen subjects performed the same activities controlled by success algorithms that modify game difficulty incrementally.

33 persons 20 to 80 years of age, at least six months post stroke with moderate to mild hemiparesis were randomized using a random number generator into the two groups. They were tested using the Action Research Arm Test, Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment, Stroke Impact Scale and Intrinsic Motivation Inventory pre and post training. Adherence was measured using timestamps generated by the system. Subjects had the Home Virtual Rehabilitation System [1]systems placed in their homes and were taught to perform rehabilitation games using it. Subjects were instructed to train twenty minutes per day but were allowed to train as much as they chose. Subjects trained for twelve weeks without appointments and received intermittent support from study staff. Group outcomes were compared using ANOVA. Correlations between subject demographics and adherence, as well as motor outcome, were evaluated using Pearson Correlation Coefficients. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) models were generated to predict responders using demographics and baseline measures.

There were 5 dropouts and no adverse events. The main effect of time was statistically significant for four of the five clinical outcome measures. There were no significant training group by time interactions. Measures of adherence did not differ between groups. 21 subjects from both groups, demonstrated clinically important improvements in UEFMA score of at least 4.25 points. Subjects with pre training UEFMA scores below 53.5 averaged a seven-point UEFMA increase. IMI scores were stable pre to post training.

Scaffolding did not have a meaningful impact on adherence or motor function improvement. A sparsely supervised program of game-based treatment in the home was sufficient to elicit meaningful improvements in motor function and activities of daily living. Common factors considered barriers to the utilization of telerehabilitation did not impact adherence or motor outcome.

Clinical Trials.gov - NCT03985761, Registered June 14, 2019.

Figures