Standardized Workflow for Precise Mid- and High-Throughput Proteomics of Blood Biofluids
Angela Mc Ardle, Aleksandra Binek, Annie Moradian, Blandine Chazarin Orgel, Alejandro Rivas, Kirstin E. Washington, Conor Phebus, Danica-Mae Manalo, James Go, Vidya Venkatraman, Casey W. Coutelin Johnson, Qin Fu, Susan Cheng, Koen Raedschelders, Justyna Fert-Bober

TL;DR
This paper presents a standardized proteomics workflow for analyzing proteins in different blood samples, improving reproducibility and enabling high-throughput and mid-throughput analysis.
Contribution
A unified, reproducible workflow for proteomics of three blood biofluids with optimized high-throughput and mid-throughput settings.
Findings
High-throughput workflows achieved inter-day CV <30% for 74% of plasma, 93% of depleted, and 87% of dried blood peptides.
Mid-throughput workflows showed 67% (plasma), 90% (depleted), and 78% (dried blood) of peptides with inter-day CV <30%.
The workflow enables quantifiable detection of proteins across a broad dynamic range in different blood matrices.
Abstract
Accurate discovery assay workflows are critical for identifying authentic circulating protein biomarkers in diverse blood matrices. Maximizing the commonalities in the proteomic workflows between different biofluids simplifies the approach and increases the likelihood for reproducibility. We developed a workflow that can accommodate 3 blood-based proteomes: naive plasma, depleted plasma and dried blood. Optimal conditions for sample preparation and data independent acquisition-mass spectrometry analysis were established in plasma then automated for depleted plasma and dried blood. The mass spectrometry workflow was modified to facilitate sensitive high-throughput analysis or deeper profiling with mid-throughput analysis. Analytical performance was evaluated by the linear response of peptides and proteins to a 6- or 7-point dilution curve and the reproducibility of the relative peptide…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinance, Taxation, and Governance
