# SBRT in Lymph-Nodal Oligometastases from Prostate Cancer: Different Outcomes between Pelvic and Para-Aortic Disease

## TL;DR

This study compares outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence that para-aortic metastases may have similar progression-free survival to pelvic metastases when treated with SBRT.

## Key findings

- Median progression-free survival was 20 months for pelvic and 11 months for para-aortic metastases.
- Local progression-free survival was high at 90.5% after five years.
- Propensity score matching showed no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups.

## Abstract

Background: Lymph-nodal prostate cancer oligometastases are differently treated according to their site: pelvic are locoregional lymph nodes; instead, para-aortic lymph nodes are considered as distant metastases. The aim of the study was a comparison between para-aortic and pelvic oligometastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis. De novo metastatic or extra-nodal disease were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed; the pattern of recurrence was also evaluated. A propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to create comparable cohorts. The primary end-point was the progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end-points were biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), ADT-free survival (ADTFS), polymetastases-free survival (PMFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), and pattern of relapse. Results: In total, 240 lymph-nodal oligometastases in 164 patients (127 pelvic and 37 para-aortic) were treated. The median PFS was 20 and 11 months in pelvic and para-aortic patients, respectively (p = 0.042). The difference was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.06). The median BRFS was 16 and 9 months, respectively, in the pelvic and para-aortic group (p = 0.07). No statistically significant differences for ADTFS or PMFS were detected. The cumulative 5-year LPFS was 90.5%. In PSM, no statistically significant differences for all the study end-points were detected. Conclusions: Patients affected by para-aortic disease might have a PFS comparable to pelvic disease; local control is high in both cohorts. Our results also support the use of SBRT for para-aortic metastases.