The genome sequence of the Marbled White Spot, Protodeltote pygarga (Hufnagel, 1766)
Douglas Boyes, Owen T. Lewis, Tyler Scott Alioto, Maria Nilsson, Alex Makunin, Balaji Chattopadhyay

TL;DR
This paper presents the genome sequence of the Marbled White Spot butterfly, including chromosomal scaffolds and gene annotations.
Contribution
The study provides a high-quality genome assembly and gene annotation for Protodeltote pygarga.
Findings
The genome assembly spans 421.1 megabases and includes 31 chromosomal pseudomolecules.
Gene annotation identified 17,784 protein-coding genes using Ensembl.
The mitochondrial genome is 15.48 kilobases in length.
Abstract
We present a genome assembly from an individual male Protodeltote pygarga (the Marbled White Spot; Arthropoda; Insecta; Lepidoptera; Noctuidae). The genome sequence is 421.1 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 31 chromosomal pseudomolecules, including the Z sex chromosome. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 15.48 kilobases in length. Gene annotation of this assembly on Ensembl identified 17,784 protein coding genes.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5| Project accession data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Assembly identifier | ilProPyga1.2 | |
| Species |
| |
| Specimen | ilProPyga1 | |
| NCBI taxonomy ID | 708063 | |
| BioProject | PRJEB51452 | |
| BioSample ID | SAMEA7631560 | |
| Isolate information | ilProPyga1, male: thorax (Hi-C data) | |
| Assembly metrics
|
| |
| Consensus quality (QV) | 69.4 |
|
|
| 100% |
|
| BUSCO
| C:99.0%[S:98.8%,D:0.2%],
|
|
| Percentage of assembly mapped
| 99.98% |
|
| Sex chromosomes | Z chromosome |
|
| Organelles | Mitochondrial genome assembled |
|
| Raw data accessions | ||
| PacificBiosciences SEQUEL II | ERR9284042, ERR9284043 | |
| Hi-C Illumina | ERR9248439 | |
| Genome assembly | ||
| Assembly accession | GCA_936450705.2 | |
|
| GCA_936440985.2 | |
| Span (Mb) | 421.1 | |
| Number of contigs | 44 | |
| Contig N50 length (Mb) | 14.7 | |
| Number of scaffolds | 33 | |
| Scaffold N50 length (Mb) | 14.9 | |
| Longest scaffold (Mb) | 21.8 | |
| Genome annotation | ||
| Number of protein-coding genes | 17,784 | |
| Number of gene transcripts | 17,968 | |
| INSDC accession | Chromosome | Length (Mb) | GC% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.74 | 35.0 | |
| 2 | 17.08 | 35.5 | |
| 3 | 16.72 | 35.0 | |
| 4 | 16.89 | 35.5 | |
| 5 | 16.86 | 35.5 | |
| 6 | 16.11 | 35.0 | |
| 7 | 15.99 | 35.0 | |
| 8 | 16.0 | 35.0 | |
| 9 | 15.73 | 35.0 | |
| 10 | 15.69 | 35.5 | |
| 11 | 15.53 | 35.0 | |
| 12 | 14.9 | 35.0 | |
| 13 | 14.78 | 35.5 | |
| 14 | 14.66 | 35.5 | |
| 15 | 14.25 | 35.0 | |
| 16 | 14.14 | 35.5 | |
| 17 | 13.78 | 35.5 | |
| 18 | 13.58 | 36.0 | |
| 19 | 13.02 | 36.0 | |
| 20 | 12.48 | 35.5 | |
| 21 | 12.43 | 36.0 | |
| 22 | 11.16 | 35.5 | |
| 23 | 11.11 | 36.5 | |
| 24 | 10.43 | 36.0 | |
| 25 | 10.3 | 36.0 | |
| 26 | 9.37 | 36.0 | |
| 27 | 7.87 | 37.0 | |
| 28 | 6.97 | 37.5 | |
| 29 | 6.98 | 38.0 | |
| 30 | 6.76 | 37.5 | |
| Z | 21.8 | 35.5 | |
| MT | 0.02 | 18.5 |
| Software tool | Version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| BlobToolKit | 4.0.7 |
|
| BUSCO | 5.3.2 |
|
| Hifiasm | 0.16.1-r375 |
|
| HiGlass | 1.11.6 |
|
| Merqury | MerquryFK |
|
| MitoHiFi | 2 |
|
| PretextView | 0.2 |
|
| purge_dups | 1.2.3 |
|
| sanger-tol/genomenote | v1.0 |
|
| sanger-tol/readmapping | 1.1.0 |
|
| YaHS | yahs-1.1.91eebc2 |
|
- —Wellcome Trust
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Genetic diversity and population structure · Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Species taxonomy
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Panarthropoda; Arthropoda; Mandibulata; Pancrustacea; Hexapoda; Insecta; Dicondylia; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Amphiesmenoptera; Lepidoptera; Glossata; Neolepidoptera; Heteroneura; Ditrysia; Obtectomera; Noctuoidea; Noctuidae; Eustrotiinae; Protodeltote; Protodeltote pygarga (Hufnagel, 1766) (NCBI:txid708063).
Background
The Marbled White Spot ( Protodeltote pygarga) is a small noctuid moth. This species has undergone a marked range expansion in Britain and Ireland in recent decades. It now occurs widely in grassland, heathland, woodland and moorland habitats, but is absent from Scotland and northern England ( Randle et al., 2019). Its distribution extends across much of Europe to western and central Asia, and it is also recorded from Japan, Korea and China ( GBIF Secretariat, 2023).
The larval host plants are grasses. This species has a single annual generation and overwinters as a pupa underground ( Waring et al., 2017).
The genome of the marbled white spot, Protodeltote pygarga, was sequenced as part of the Darwin Tree of Life Project, a collaborative effort to sequence all named eukaryotic species in the Atlantic Archipelago of Britain and Ireland. Here we present a chromosomally complete genome sequence for Protodeltote pygarga, based on one male specimen from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire.
Genome sequence report
The genome was sequenced from one male Protodeltote pygarga ( Figure 1) collected from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire, UK (51.77, –1.34). A total of 92-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads was generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data. Manual assembly curation corrected 7 missing joins or mis-joins and removed 2 haplotypic duplications, reducing the assembly length by 0.45%.
Photograph of the Protodeltote pygarga (ilProPyga1) specimen used for genome sequencing.
The final assembly has a total length of 421.1 Mb in 33 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 14.9 Mb ( Table 1). The snailplot in Figure 2 provides a summary of the assembly statistics, while the distribution of reads on GC proportion and coverage is shown in Figure 3. The cumulative assembly plot in Figure 4 shows curves for subsets of scaffolds assigned to different phyla. Most (99.98 %) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 31 chromosomal-level scaffolds, representing 30 autosomes and the Z sex chromosome. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 5; Table 2). While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited. The mitochondrial genome was also assembled and can be found as a contig within the multifasta file of the genome submission.
Table 1.: Genome data for Protodeltote pygarga, ilProPyga1.2.
Genome assembly of Protodeltote pygarga, ilProPyga1.2: metrics.The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 421,153,487 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (21,803,012 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (14,901,961 and 10,302,340 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the lepidoptera_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Protodeltote%20pygarga/dataset/CAMPPH01/snail.
Genome assembly of Protodeltote pygarga, ilProPyga1.2: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot.Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to sequence length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Protodeltote%20pygarga/dataset/CAMPPH01/blob.
Genome assembly of Protodeltote pygarga, ilProPyga1.2: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot.The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Protodeltote%20pygarga/dataset/CAMPPH01/cumulative.
Genome assembly of Protodeltote pygarga, ilProPyga1.2: Hi-C contact map of the ilProPyga1.2 assembly, visualised using HiGlass.Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=NRR27qs_Twah2X0btFEQTQ.
Table 2.: Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Protodeltote pygarga, ilProPyga1.
The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 69.4 with k-mer completeness of 100%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.3.2 completeness of 99.0% (single = 98.8%, duplicated = 0.2%), using the lepidoptera_odb10 reference set ( n = 5,286).
Metadata for specimens, barcode results, spectra estimates, sequencing runs, contaminants and pre-curation assembly statistics are given at https://links.tol.sanger.ac.uk/species/708063.
Genome annotation report
The Protodeltote pygarga genome assembly (GCA_936450705.2) was annotated using the Ensembl rapid annotation pipeline ( Table 1; https://rapid.ensembl.org/Protodeltote_pygarga_GCA_936450705.2/Info/Index). The resulting annotation includes 17,784 transcribed mRNAs from 17,968 protein-coding genes.
Methods
Sample acquisition and nucleic acid extraction
A male Protodeltote pygarga (specimen ID Ox000464, ToLID ilProPyga1) was collected from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire (biological vice-county Berkshire), UK (latitude 51.77, longitude –1.34) on 2020-06-13, using a light trap. The specimen was collected and identified by Douglas Boyes (University of Oxford) and preserved on dry ice.
High molecular weight (HMW) DNA was extracted at the Tree of Life laboratory, Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI), following a sequence of core procedures: sample preparation; sample homogenisation; HMW DNA extraction; DNA fragmentation; and DNA clean-up. In sample preparation, the ilProPyga1 sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice ( Jay et al., 2023). Tissue from the abdomen was homogenised using a PowerMasher II tissue disruptor ( Denton et al., 2023a). HMW DNA was extracted using the Automated MagAttract v1 protocol ( Sheerin et al., 2023). DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 30 ( Todorovic et al., 2023). Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation ( Strickland et al., 2023): in brief, the method employs a 1.8X ratio of AMPure PB beads to sample to eliminate shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.
Protocols developed by the Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI) Tree of Life core laboratory have been deposited on protocols.io ( Denton et al., 2023b).
Sequencing
Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II (HiFi) and Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (10X) instruments. Hi-C data were also generated from thorax tissue of ilProPyga1 using the Arima2 kit and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.
Genome assembly, curation and evaluation
Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). The assembly was then scaffolded with Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) using YaHS ( Zhou et al., 2023). The assembly was checked for contamination and corrected as described previously ( Howe et al., 2021). Manual curation was performed using HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and Pretext ( Harry, 2022). The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2023), which runs MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020) or MITOS ( Bernt et al., 2013) and uses these annotations to select the final mitochondrial contig and to ensure the general quality of the sequence.
A Hi-C map for the final assembly was produced using bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) in the Cooler file format ( Abdennur & Mirny, 2020). To assess the assembly metrics, the k-mer completeness and QV consensus quality values were calculated in Merqury ( Rhie et al., 2020). This work was done using Nextflow ( Di Tommaso et al., 2017) DSL2 pipelines “sanger-tol/readmapping” ( Surana et al., 2023a) and “sanger-tol/genomenote” ( Surana et al., 2023b). The genome was analysed within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020) and BUSCO scores ( Manni et al., 2021; Simão et al., 2015) were calculated.
Table 3 contains a list of relevant software tool versions and sources.
Genome annotation
The BRAKER2 pipeline ( Brůna et al., 2021) was used in the default protein mode to generate annotation for the Protodeltote pygarga assembly (GCA_936450705.2) in Ensembl Rapid Release.
Wellcome Sanger Institute – Legal and Governance
The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner. The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the ‘Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice’, which can be found in full on the Darwin Tree of Life website here. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project.
Further, the Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use. The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so we align with best practice wherever possible. The overarching areas of consideration are:
• Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the material
• Legality of collection, transfer and use (national and international)
Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Abdennur N Mirny LA : Cooler: Scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(1):311–316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz 540 31290943 PMC 8205516 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Allio R Schomaker-Bastos A Romiguier J : Mito Finder: Efficient automated large-scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 32243090 PMC 7497042 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Bernt M Donath A Jühling F : MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69(2):313–319. 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023 22982435 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Brůna T Hoff KJ Lomsadze A : BRAKER 2: Automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with Gene Mark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database. NAR Genom Bioinform. 2021;3(1): lqaa 108. 10.1093/nargab/lqaa 108 33575650 PMC 7787252 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Challis R Richards E Rajan J : Blob Tool Kit - interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G 3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g 3.119.400908 32071071 PMC 7144090 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Cheng H Concepcion GT Feng X : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s 41592-020-01056-5 33526886 PMC 7961889 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Denton A Oatley G Cornwell C : Sanger Tree of Life Sample Homogenisation: Power Mash. protocols.io. 2023 a. 10.17504/protocols.io.5qpvo 3r 19v 4o/v 1 · doi ↗
- 8Denton A Yatsenko H Jay J : Sanger Tree of Life Wet Laboratory Protocol Collection. protocols.io. 2023 b. 10.17504/protocols.io.8epv 5xxy 6g 1b/v 1 · doi ↗
