# Association of Advanced Airway Management in Preference to Intravenous Adrenaline on Neurological Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

## TL;DR

This study found that advanced airway management may lead to better neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythms compared to intravenous adrenaline.

## Contribution

The study identifies a link between advanced airway management and improved outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythms.

## Key findings

- AAM preferred group had better neurological outcomes for shockable rhythm patients (13.6% vs 9.3%).
- AAM was independently associated with favorable outcomes in shockable rhythm cases (adjusted odds ratio 1.66).
- No significant difference was found in nonshockable rhythm patients between the two groups.

## Abstract

Aim: To examine the preference for advanced airway management (AAM) or intravenous adrenaline administration (IVAd) provided by emergency medical services (EMS) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with shockable or nonshockable rhythms.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a nationwide cohort of OHCA patients in Japan. Adult patients with witnessed collapse who were provided AAM and/or IVAd by EMS between June 2014 and December 2019 were divided into the AAM preferred group and IVAd preferred group, according to the initial advanced EMS intervention. The rates of favorable neurological outcomes (cerebral performance category 1 or 2 after 30 days) were compared between groups of patients with initial shockable or nonshockable rhythms.

Results: We analyzed 1365 and 9733 patients with initial shockable and nonshockable rhythms, respectively. Of these patients, 1033 (75.7%) with shockable and 7844 (80.6%) with nonshockable rhythms, respectively, were assigned to the AAM preferred group. Favorable neurological outcomes were significantly more frequent in the AAM preferred group than in the IVAd preferred group in patients with a shockable rhythm (13.6% vs 9.3%, respectively; P = 0.039), but not in those with a nonshockable rhythm (1.0% vs 0.8%, respectively; P = 0.509). Preferred AAM was independently associated with a higher probability of favorable neurological outcomes in patients with a shockable rhythm (adjusted odds ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.53, P = 0.020), but not in patients with a nonshockable rhythm.

Conclusions: AAM provided by EMS in preference to IVAd was associated with the favorable neurological outcomes of OHCA patients with shockable rhythms.