Perspectives of researchers, science policy makers and research ethics committee members on the feedback of individual genetic research findings in African genomics research
Faith Musvipwa, Ambroise Wonkam, Benjamin Berkman, Jantina de Vries

TL;DR
Researchers and policymakers in Africa believe participants should receive clinically relevant genetic findings, but there is a need for clear guidelines on how to do this.
Contribution
The study provides insights into African perspectives on returning individual genetic research findings, highlighting the need for context-specific guidance.
Findings
Respondents believe clinically actionable genetic findings should be returned to participants.
There is a lack of consensus on whether individual genomic results should be fed back.
Clear guidelines are needed to determine what findings should be returned in African genomics research.
Abstract
Genetic research can yield information that is unrelated to the study’s objectives but may be of clinical or personal interest to study participants. There is an emerging but controversial responsibility to return some genetic research results, however there is little evidence available about the views of genomic researchers and others on the African continent. We conducted a continental survey to solicit perspectives of researchers, science policy makers and research ethics committee members on the feedback of individual genetic research findings in African genomics research. A total of 110 persons participated in the survey with 51 complete and 59 incomplete surveys received. Data was summarised using descriptive analysis. Overall, our respondents believed that individual genetic research results that are clinically actionable should be returned to study participants apparently…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 10
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics in Clinical Research · Genomics and Rare Diseases · BRCA gene mutations in cancer
