# Human-annotated rationales and explainable text classification: a survey

**Authors:** Elize Herrewijnen, Dong Nguyen, Floris Bex, Kees van Deemter

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/frai.2024.1260952 · 2024-05-24

## TL;DR

This paper reviews how human explanations for classifications can improve data quality and help build more explainable AI models.

## Contribution

The paper provides a survey on the collection and use of human-annotated rationales for explainable text classification.

## Key findings

- Human-annotated rationales improve data quality and model performance.
- They serve as a benchmark for evaluating model-generated explanations.
- Rationales are crucial for advancing explainable artificial intelligence.

## Abstract

Asking annotators to explain “why” they labeled an instance yields annotator rationales: natural language explanations that provide reasons for classifications. In this work, we survey the collection and use of annotator rationales. Human-annotated rationales can improve data quality and form a valuable resource for improving machine learning models. Moreover, human-annotated rationales can inspire the construction and evaluation of model-annotated rationales, which can play an important role in explainable artificial intelligence.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11157010/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11157010