# Surgical Technique and Preliminary Outcomes of Double-Level Osteotomy for Valgus Deformity

## TL;DR

This study describes a surgical technique for correcting severe knee deformities and shows it leads to improved knee function and accurate correction.

## Contribution

The paper introduces and evaluates a double-level osteotomy technique for valgus deformity with high surgical accuracy and functional outcomes.

## Key findings

- The mTFA significantly improved from 10.3° to –1.8° postoperatively.
- All clinical scores showed significant improvement after the surgery.
- Surgical correction accuracy had a mean deviation of 2.7° from the planned correction.

## Abstract

Data are limited regarding the surgical technique or outcomes of double-level osteotomy (DLO) combining medial closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy and medial closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy in patients with moderate-to-severe valgus deformity.

To describe the surgical technique and assess the short-term outcomes and surgical accuracy of DLO in patients with a moderate or severe valgus deformity. It was hypothesized that this technique would result in good clinical outcomes with precise deformity correction.

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Eight patients (mean age, 44.2 ± 10.9 years) with a moderate or severe valgus knee treated with DLO (9 knees; mechanical tibiofemoral angle [mTFA], 10.3°± 3.5°) were included. The mean follow-up was 25.1 ± 11.1 months. Preoperative to postoperative changes in radiographic parameters (mTFA, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, joint line convergence angle) and clinical scores (Hospital for Special Surgery score, Oxford Knee Score, Lysholm score) were assessed. Surgical accuracy was calculated by subtracting the achieved postoperative correction from the preoperatively planned targeted correction.

The mTFA changed significantly from 10.3°± 3.5° preoperatively to –1.8°± 3.4° postoperatively (P < .001); the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle changed significantly by 5.1°± 2.7° and 5.9°± 2.2°, respectively (P < .001 for both); and the posterior distal femoral angle decreased significantly from 85.9°± 3.1° to 84.2°± 2.4° (P < .01). There was no significant difference between pre- and postoperative joint line convergence angles (3.3°± 2.3° to 2.6°± 2.1°). The accuracy of the correction was high: the mTFA achieved postoperatively differed from the mTFA planned preoperatively by a mean of 2.7°± 1.9° (range, 0.6°-6.6°). Significant pre- to postoperative improvement was seen for all outcome scores (Hospital for Special Surgery, from 67 ± 11 to 93 ± 4; Oxford Knee Score, from 29 ± 7 to 43 ± 3; Lysholm, from 41 ± 24 to 89 ± 8; P < .001 for all).

High surgical accuracy was achieved, and patients who underwent varus DLO for valgus knees showed improved knee function at short-term follow-up. Varus DLO can be a surgical option to restore the optimal alignment and joint line obliquity in patients with moderate or severe valgus malalignment.