# Hard to reach? Methodological challenges researching vulnerable, gang‐involved, young people

## TL;DR

This paper discusses the ethical and methodological challenges of researching vulnerable, gang-involved young people and offers practical strategies for meaningful engagement.

## Contribution

The paper provides a practical guide for overcoming methodological and ethical barriers in researching marginalized young people.

## Key findings

- Public engagement with gatekeepers and creative interview methods help facilitate meaningful participation from young people.
- Power imbalances and reflexivity are critical considerations in research with marginalized youth.
- The study highlights the importance of authentic youth voices in shaping health and education policies.

## Abstract

Research with young people (YP) is ethically challenging and bound in a complex maze of issues relating to power, voice and representation. Such sensitivities mean that the challenges raised in researching marginalised YP are often hard to navigate. This paper reports on research carried out with YP to explore links between mental health, school exclusion and involvement in criminal gangs. It aims to provide a practical guide to negotiating some of the methodological and ethical challenges experienced.

In‐depth interviews conducted with 28 YP (aged 14–24 years) who were gang involved or seen to be at risk of gang involvement. Research was conducted in youth clubs, alternative provision and youth justice settings.

We reflect on how navigating ethics can create barriers to involving YP as primary informants in research. We consider why it is important to overcome these hurdles and how public engagement work with recognised gatekeepers and the use of creative interview methods can facilitate meaningful encounters, where YP feel able to share valuable insights into their lives.

Alongside a number of specific learning points, the paper reflects on theories behind research with YP, including the need for recognition of power imbalances and reflexivity. It concludes with thoughts on the practical realities of achieving meaningful participation or an ‘authentic voice’ with marginalised groups and the importance of this in informing policy and practice.

The focus of this work was to collect experiences of YP who are recognised as gang‐involved or at risk of being so, with a view to informing health and education policies. The scoping study for the project involved extensive public engagement work with YP exploring and trialling suitable methods of accessing, recruiting and ultimately interviewing this target group. This is central to the discussion within the body of the paper.