Correction: Highly-sensitive wafer-scale transfer-free graphene MEMS condenser microphones
Roberto Pezone, Sebastian Anzinger, Gabriele Baglioni, Hutomo Suryo Wasisto, Pasqualina M. Sarro, Peter G. Steeneken, Sten Vollebregt
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Correction to: Microsystems & Nanoengineering
10.1038/s41378-024-00656-x published online 21 February 2024
After publication of this article^1^, it was brought to our attention that two pressure values were not correctly copied from the submitted original work to the published version.
Correction 1 (from PDF, Page 4 of 9): “These membranes show resonance frequencies above the audible range (f01 > 20 kHz) at 1 × 10^3^ mbar by piezo-shaker actuation”. The described phrase needs to be changed reporting the right pressure value of 1 × 10^−3^ mbar. The new phrase will be: “These membranes show resonance frequencies above the audible range (f_01_ > 20 kHz) at 1 × 10^−3^ mbar by piezo-shaker actuation”.
Correction 2 (from PDF, Page 4 of 9): “Energy losses and dampening are minimized due to the low pressure of 1 × 10^3^ mbar”. Again, the described phrase needs to be changed reporting the right pressure value of 1 × 10^−3^ mbar. The new phrase will be: “Energy losses and dampening are minimized due to the low pressure of 1 × 10^−3^ mbar”.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.