Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Serbian Aphasia Screening Test
Mile Vuković, Tanja Milovanović, Predrag Teovanović, Vesna Stojanovik

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new aphasia screening test for Serbian speakers, showing it is reliable and effective at identifying language disorders.
Contribution
The paper introduces the Serbian Aphasia Screening Test (SAST), a culturally tailored aphasia screening tool with validated psychometric properties.
Findings
The SAST demonstrated excellent inter-rater, test-retest, and internal consistency reliability.
Significant differences were found between aphasia patients and neurotypical controls on all subtests.
The SAST showed good convergent validity when compared to the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination.
Abstract
A rise in strokes worldwide means that the number of people affected by aphasia is increasing. Early and accurate diagnosis of aphasia is crucial for recovery. Presently, there are no dedicated screening tests tailored for evaluating aphasia in Serbian-speaking individuals. This paper presents and describes the psychometric properties of the Serbian Aphasia Screening Test (SAST), a novel aphasia screening tool designed specifically for Serbian speakers. This initiative fills the gap in aphasia assessment tools for the Serbian population, providing a comprehensive and culturally sensitive approach to the evaluation of language disorders. Data using the SAST were collected from 240 participants: 120 Serbian speakers with aphasia after stroke compared to 120 neurotypical individuals. The assessment included the following subtests: conversation, verbal automatized sequences, auditory…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistorical Studies in Latin America
