Establishing neuroanatomical correspondences across mouse and marmoset brain structures

TL;DR

This paper establishes a framework to compare brain structures between mice and marmosets, revealing that detailed, fine-level structures are more comparable than previously thought.

Contribution

A novel theoretical framework for cross-species neuroanatomical correspondence using leaf-level brain structures.

Findings

43% of mouse and 47% of marmoset leaf-level structures have one-to-one correspondences.

25% of mouse and 10% of marmoset structures could not be related.

A computational tool was developed to visualize and query brain structure correspondences.

Abstract

Interest in the common marmoset is growing due to evolutionarily proximity to humans compared to laboratory mice, necessitating a comparison of mouse and marmoset brain architectures, including connectivity and cell type distributions. Creating an actionable comparative platform is challenging since these brains have distinct spatial organizations and expert neuroanatomists disagree. We propose a general theoretical framework to relate named atlas compartments across taxa and use it to establish a detailed correspondence between marmoset and mice brains. Contrary to conventional wisdom that brain structures may be easier to relate at higher levels of the atlas hierarchy, we find that finer parcellations at the leaf levels offer greater reconcilability despite naming discrepancies. Utilizing existing atlases and associated literature, we created a list of leaf-level structures for both species and establish five types of correspondence between them. One-to-one relations were found between 43% of the structures in mouse and 47% in marmoset, whereas 25% of mouse and 10% of marmoset structures were not relatable. The remaining structures show a set of more complex mappings which we quantify. Implementing this correspondence with volumetric atlases of the two species, we make available a computational tool for querying and visualizing relationships between the corresponding brains. Our findings provide a foundation for computational comparative analyses of mesoscale connectivity and cell type distributions in the laboratory mouse and the common marmoset.

Figures