The genome sequence of an ichneumonid wasp, Campoletis raptor (Zetterstedt, 1838)
Gavin R. Broad, Chris Fletcher, Inez Januszczak, Marko Prous, Željko Tomanović

TL;DR
This paper reports the genome sequence of the Campoletis raptor wasp, including a detailed assembly of its chromosomes and mitochondrial DNA.
Contribution
The study provides a high-quality genome assembly of the Campoletis raptor wasp, including scaffolded chromosomes and a mitochondrial genome.
Findings
The genome assembly spans 218.6 megabases and is scaffolded into 11 chromosomal pseudomolecules.
The mitochondrial genome is 28.53 kilobases in length and has been fully assembled.
Abstract
We present a genome assembly from an individual female Campoletis raptor (an ichneumonid wasp; Arthropoda; Insecta; Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae). The genome sequence is 218.6 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 11 chromosomal pseudomolecules. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 28.53 kilobases in length.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4| Project accession data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Assembly identifier | iyCamRapt1.1 | |
| Species |
| |
| Specimen | iyCamRapt1 | |
| NCBI taxonomy ID | 2922060 | |
| BioProject | PRJEB56062 | |
| BioSample ID | SAMEA14448294 | |
| Isolate information | iyCamRapt1, female: whole organism (DNA sequencing and Hi-C
| |
| Assembly metrics
|
| |
| Consensus quality (QV) | 63.6 |
|
|
| 100% |
|
| BUSCO
| C:95.0%[S:94.7%,D:0.3%],
|
|
| Percentage of assembly mapped to chromosomes | 99.98% |
|
| Sex chromosomes | - |
|
| Organelles | Mitochondrial genome assembled |
|
| Raw data accessions | ||
| PacificBiosciences SEQUEL II | ERR10224930 | |
| Hi-C Illumina | ERR10297824 | |
| Genome assembly | ||
| Assembly accession | GCA_948107755.1 | |
|
| GCA_948107775.1 | |
| Span (Mb) | 218.6 | |
| Number of contigs | 177 | |
| Contig N50 length (Mb) | 2.2 | |
| Number of scaffolds | 20 | |
| Scaffold N50 length (Mb) | 18.6 | |
| Longest scaffold (Mb) | 38.2 | |
| INSDC accession | Chromosome | Length (Mb) | GC% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38.2 | 36.0 | |
| 2 | 24.52 | 36.5 | |
| 3 | 24.23 | 36.5 | |
| 5 | 18.65 | 36.5 | |
| 6 | 18.62 | 37.0 | |
| 7 | 18.21 | 37.0 | |
| 4 | 18.0 | 37.5 | |
| 8 | 18.0 | 36.5 | |
| 9 | 17.03 | 36.5 | |
| 10 | 12.88 | 36.5 | |
| 11 | 9.1 | 36.5 | |
| MT | 0.03 | 14.5 |
| Software
| Version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| BlobToolKit | 4.1.7 |
|
| BUSCO | 5.3.2 |
|
| Hifiasm | 0.16.1-r375 |
|
| HiGlass | 1.11.6 |
|
| Merqury | MerquryFK |
|
| MitoHiFi | 2 |
|
| PretextView | 0.2 |
|
| purge_dups | 1.2.3 |
|
| sanger-tol/
| v1.0 |
|
| sanger-tol/
| 1.1.0 |
|
| YaHS | yahs-
|
|
- —Wellcome Trust
- —Wellcome Trust
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny · Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences · Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Species taxonomy
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Panarthropoda; Arthropoda; Mandibulata; Pancrustacea; Hexapoda; Insecta; Dicondylia; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Hymenoptera; Apocrita; Ichneumonoidea; Ichneumonidae; Campopleginae; Dusona group; Campoletis; Campoletis raptor (Zetterstedt, 1838) (NCBI:txid2922060).
Background
Campoletis raptor is a small (5–8 mm body length), largely black ichneumonid wasp with the metasoma mostly red medially, and with the hind tibia banded black and pale red. The ovipositor is relatively long and apically strongly upcurved. As with most species of Campoletis, the clypeus (below the face) has a median point. Campopleginae genera can be difficult to identify, although Klopfstein et al. (2022) have produced an interactive key to European genera. Riedel (2017) has revised the European species of Campoletis, with identification keys. The nominate subspecies of C. raptor ranges from Spain and the UK in the West to Bulgaria in the East, with a separate subspecies described for populations in Central Asia, in Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan ( Riedel, 2017). Very little is known about the distribution of C. raptor in Britain or Ireland, although there are museum specimens from England.
As with most species of the ichneumonid subfamily Campopleginae, C. raptor is a koinobiont endoparasitoid of Lepidoptera larvae. Oviposition is into a small larva which is killed in a later instar, with the wasp larva spinning a cocoon outside the host remains. A variety of lepidopteran hosts have been reported for C. raptor, but these are mostly dubious because of potential parasitoid misidentifications. Riedel (2017), in his recent taxonomic revision, only reported Mythimna conigera (Denis & Schiffermüller) (Brown-line Bright-eye) as a host, although it is likely other hosts are attacked too. Campoletis species often have distinctively patterned, black and white cocoons, presumably mimicking bird droppings to offer some defence as they pupate in relatively exposed positions, with the host larva killed before it is fully grown ( Broad et al., 2018).
Although little is known of the biology of C. raptor, the North American Campoletis sonorensis (Cameron) has been intensively studied as it is an important natural enemy of an agricultural pest caterpillar, Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) ( Isenhour, 1985; Isenhour, 1986). Campoletis sonorensis has a high fecundity and, as with other Campoletis species, pupation time in the cocoon can be rapid. Polydnaviruses are incorporated into the genome of C. sonorensis, helping the wasp larva overcome the host immune system ( Federici & Bigot, 2003). As more genomes of polydnavirus-carrying wasps are assembled, from congenerics to more distantly related subfamilies, we will gain greater understanding of the roles these viruses have played in the diversification of parasitoids.
Genome sequence report
The genome was sequenced from one female Campoletis raptor collected from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire (51.77, –1.31). A total of 83-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads was generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data. Manual assembly curation corrected 16 missing joins or mis-joins and removed 2 haplotypic duplications, reducing the assembly length by 0.97% and the scaffold number by 19.23%, and increasing the scaffold N50 by 2.46%.
The final assembly has a total length of 218.6 Mb in 20 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 18.6 Mb ( Table 1). Most (99.98%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 11 chromosomal-level scaffolds. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 1– Figure 4; Table 2). While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited. The mitochondrial genome was also assembled and can be found as a contig within the multifasta file of the genome submission.
Table 1.: Genome data for Campoletis raptor, iyCamRapt1.1.
Genome assembly of Campoletis raptor, iyCamRapt1.1: metrics. The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 218,627,199 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (38,199,786 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (18,621,092 and 12,881,085 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the hymenoptera_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/iyCamRapt1.1/dataset/CANUFJ01/snail.
Genome assembly of Campoletis raptor, iyCamRapt1.1: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot. Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/iyCamRapt1.1/dataset/CANUFJ01/blob.
Genome assembly of Campoletis raptor, iyCamRapt1.1: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot. The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/iyCamRapt1.1/dataset/CANUFJ01/cumulative.
Genome assembly of Campoletis raptor, iyCamRapt1.1: Hi-C contact map of the iyCamRapt1.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass. Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=Enw_fapgTv2jUIWWQSOfRg.
Table 2.: Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Campoletis raptor, iyCamRapt1.
The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 63.6 with k-mer completeness of 100%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.3.2 completeness of 95.0% (single = 94.7%, duplicated = 0.3%), using the hymenoptera_odb10 reference set ( n = 5,991).
Metadata for specimens, spectral estimates, sequencing runs, contaminants and pre-curation assembly statistics can be found at https://links.tol.sanger.ac.uk/species/2922060.
Methods
Sample acquisition and nucleic acid extraction
A female Campoletis raptor (specimen ID NHMUK014451738, individual iyCamRapt1) was collected using an aerial net in Bert’s Pheasant Pen, Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire (biological vice-county Berkshire), UK (latitude 51.77, longitude –1.31) on 2021-09-02. The collectors were Gavin Broad, Chris Fletcher and Inez Januszczak (all Natural History Museum). The specimen was identified by Gavin Broad (Natural History Museum) and then dry frozen (–80°C).
The specimen was prepared for DNA extraction at the Tree of Life laboratory, Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI). The iyCamRapt1 sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice with tissue set aside for Hi-C sequencing. Whole organism tissue was disrupted using a Nippi Powermasher fitted with a BioMasher pestle . DNA was extracted at the Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI) Scientific Operations core using the Qiagen MagAttract HMW DNA kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Sequencing
Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on the Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II (HiFi) instrument. Hi-C data were also generated from tissue of iyCamRapt1 using the Arima2 kit and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.
Genome assembly, curation and evaluation
Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). The assembly was then scaffolded with Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) using YaHS. The assembly was checked for contamination and corrected as described previously ( Howe et al., 2021). Manual curation was performed using HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and Pretext ( Harry, 2022). The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2022), which runs MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020) or MITOS ( Bernt et al., 2013) and uses these annotations to select the final mitochondrial contig and to ensure the general quality of the sequence.
A Hi-C map for the final assembly was produced using bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) in the Cooler file format ( Abdennur & Mirny, 2020). To assess the assembly metrics, the k-mer completeness and QV consensus quality values were calculated in Merqury ( Rhie et al., 2020). This work was done using Nextflow ( Di Tommaso et al., 2017) DSL2 pipelines “sanger-tol/readmapping” ( Surana et al., 2023a) and “sanger-tol/genomenote” ( Surana et al., 2023b). The genome was analysed within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020) and BUSCO scores ( Manni et al., 2021; Simão et al., 2015) were calculated.
Table 3 contains a list of relevant software tool versions and sources.
Wellcome Sanger Institute – Legal and Governance
The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner. The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the ‘Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice’, which can be found in full on the Darwin Tree of Life website here. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project.
Further, the Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use. The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so we align with best practice wherever possible. The overarching areas of consideration are:
• Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the material
• Legality of collection, transfer and use (national and international)
Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Abdennur N Mirny LA : Cooler: Scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(1):311–316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz 540 31290943 PMC 8205516 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Allio R Schomaker-Bastos A Romiguier J : Mito Finder: Efficient automated large-scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 32243090 PMC 7497042 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Bernt M Donath A Jühling F : MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69(2):313–319. 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023 22982435 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Broad GR Shaw MR Fitton MG : The ichneumonid wasps of Britain and Ireland (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): Their classification and biology.In: Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects.Telford: Royal Entomological Society and Field Studies Council,2018;7. Reference Source
- 5Challis R Richards E Rajan J : Blob Tool Kit - interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G 3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g 3.119.400908 32071071 PMC 7144090 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Cheng H Concepcion GT Feng X : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s 41592-020-01056-5 33526886 PMC 7961889 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Di Tommaso P Chatzou M Floden EW : Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(4):316–319. 10.1038/nbt.3820 28398311 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Federici BA Bigot Y : Origin and evolution of polydnaviruses by symbiogenesis of insect DNA viruses in endoparasitic wasps. J Insect Physiol. 2003;49(5):419–432. 10.1016/s 0022-1910(03)00059-3 12770621 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
