Effect of low versus high balance training complexity on balance performance in male adolescents

TL;DR

This study found that balance training improves balance performance in male adolescents, regardless of whether the training is simple or complex.

Contribution

The study demonstrates that balance training complexity does not affect balance performance improvements in male adolescents.

Findings

Both low and high balance training complexity improved static and dynamic balance performance significantly.

No significant differences were found between the two training complexities in most balance measures.

Balance training is effective for improving balance in healthy male adolescents.

Abstract

The current study aimed to determine the effects of low (i.e., balance task only) versus high (i.e., balance task combined with an additional motor task like dribbling a basketball) balance training complexity (6 weeks of training consisting of 2 × 30 min balance exercises per week) on measures of static and dynamic balance in 44 healthy male adolescents (mean age: 13.3 ± 1.6 years).

Irrespective of balance training complexity, significant medium- to large-sized pretest to posttest improvements were detected for static (i.e., One-Legged Stance test, stance time [s], 0.001 < p ≤ 0.008) and dynamic (i.e., 3-m Beam Walking Backward test, steps [n], 0.001 < p ≤ 0.002; Y-Balance-Test-Lower-Quarter, reach distance [cm], 0.001 < p ≤ 0.003) balance performance. Further, in all but one comparison (i.e., stance time with eyes opened on foam ground) no group × test interactions were found. These results imply that balance training is effective to improve static and dynamic measures of balance in healthy male adolescents, but the effectiveness seems unaffected by the applied level of balance training complexity.