# Assessment of the feed additive consisting of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC PTA‐6139 for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (Pioneer Hi‐Bred International, Inc.)

**Authors:** Vasileios Bampidis, Giovanna Azimonti, Maria de Lourdes Bastos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Maryline Kouba, Marta López‐Alonso, Secundino López Puente, Francesca Marcon, Baltasar Mayo, Alena Pechová, Mariana Petkova, Fernando Ramos, Roberto Edoardo Villa, Ruud Woutersen, Paul Brantom, Montserrat Anguita, Nicole Bozzi Cionci, Rosella Brozzi, Jaume Galobart, Matteo L. Innocenti, Joana Revez

PMC · DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8785 · EFSA Journal · 2024-05-27

## TL;DR

This paper assesses the safety of a feed additive for animals, finding it safe for use but noting potential risks for skin and respiratory sensitization.

## Contribution

The paper provides a safety evaluation for the renewal of a feed additive's authorization.

## Key findings

- The additive is safe for animals, consumers, and the environment.
- It may cause skin and respiratory sensitization.
- No data was available to assess eye irritation potential.

## Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly Lactobacillus plantarum) ATCC PTA‐6139 as a technological additive (functional group: silage additive) for all animal species. The applicant has provided evidence that the additive currently on the market complies with the existing conditions of authorisation. The EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) concluded that the additive remains safe for all animal species, consumers and the environment. Regarding user safety, the Panel concluded that owing to the nature of the additive, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC PTA‐6139 should be considered a potential skin and respiratory sensitiser, and that any exposure through the skin and respiratory tract is considered a risk. The Panel could not conclude on the eye irritation potential of the additive due to the lack of data. There is no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (taxon 1590)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** eye irritation (MESH:D005128)
- **Species:** Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (species) [taxon 1590]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11128980/full.md

## References

5 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11128980/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11128980