Cardiac Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Community Cardiac Surgery Program: Are the Results Comparable?
Syed Saif Abbas Rizvi, Matthew Nagle, Brian Roberts, Lydia McDermott, Kathleen Miller, Claudine Pasquarello, Anissa Braddock, Chun Choi, Qiong Yang, Hitoshi Hirose

TL;DR
This study shows that a community hospital's ECMO program for heart failure patients can achieve results similar to national averages when protocols and standards are optimized.
Contribution
Demonstrates that community hospitals can achieve comparable ECMO outcomes to larger centers through optimized protocols and cannulation standards.
Findings
The overall survival rate for cardiac ECMO was 48%, matching the ELSO national average.
Hospital survival rates for VA ECMO and ECPR were 36% and 28%, close to the national averages of 48% and 30%.
ECMO outcomes in a community hospital setting were not significantly worse than those in larger centers.
Abstract
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) outcomes in small centers are commonly considered less favorable than in large-volume centers. New ECMO protocols and procedures were established in our regional community hospital system as part of a cardiogenic shock initiative. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the outcomes of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in a community hospital system with cardiac surgery capability and assess whether protocol optimization and cannulation standards result in comparable outcomes to larger centers whether the outcomes of this new ECMO program at the community hospital setting were comparable to the United States averages. Methods: Our regional system comprises five hospitals with 1500 beds covering southwestern New Jersey, with only one of these…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMechanical Circulatory Support Devices · Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair · Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
