Evaluating the Effects of Metallic Waste on the Structural and Gamma-Ray Shielding Properties of Epoxy Composites
Sitah Alanazi, Mohammad Hanfi, Mohammad W. Marashdeh, Mamduh J. Aljaafreh, Karem A. Mahmoud

TL;DR
This study explores how adding metallic waste to epoxy composites improves their ability to block gamma rays while keeping the material lightweight and affordable.
Contribution
The novelty lies in using heavy metallic waste to enhance gamma-ray shielding properties in low-density epoxy composites.
Findings
Adding 40% metallic waste increased composite density from 1.134 to 1.560 g/cm³.
Higher metallic waste content significantly reduced half-value thickness across gamma energy ranges.
Mass attenuation coefficients improved with increased metallic waste, especially at low gamma energies.
Abstract
The objective of the research is to develop novel materials that are both inexpensive and have a low density, while also being able to endure the transportation of γ-photons with low-to-medium energy levels. The outcome consisted of four epoxy resins that were strengthened with different quantities of heavy metallic waste. The density of the formed composites improved from 1.134 ± 0.022 g/cm3 to 1.560 ± 0.0312 g/cm3 when the waste content was raised from 0 to 40 weight percent. The theoretical investigation was determined using Monte Carlo (MCNP) simulation software, and the results of linear attenuation coefficient were justified experimentally in a low and medium energy range of 15–662 keV. The mass attenuation coefficient results in a low gamma energy range (15–122 keV) varied in between 3.175 and 0.159 cm2/g (for E-MW0 composite) and in between 8.212 and 0.164 cm2/g (for E-MW40…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHigher Education Practises and Engagement · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Evaluation and Performance Assessment
