# The Impact of Political Orientation and Government Change on Public Satisfaction with Food Policy in South Korea

## TL;DR

This study explores how political views and government changes affect public satisfaction with food policies in South Korea.

## Contribution

The study provides novel insights into the nuanced relationship between political orientation, government type, and food policy satisfaction.

## Key findings

- Conservatives and liberals show higher satisfaction with labeling policies but lower with safety and redress policies.
- A conservative government correlates with higher satisfaction in specific areas but lower overall satisfaction.
- Shifts toward liberalism are linked to decreased policy satisfaction.

## Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between political orientation, government change, and public satisfaction with food policies in the Republic of Korea. Utilizing data from the Consumer Behavior Survey for Foods (CBSF) conducted by the Korea Rural Economic Institute from 2020 to 2021, we employ fixed effects models to examine the impact of political orientation, the presence of a conservative government, and their interactions on satisfaction across various dimensions of food policy. We also analyze the change in satisfaction levels from 2020 to 2021 based on shifts in political orientation. The results reveal complex dynamics between political alignment, government performance, and public perceptions. While conservatives and liberals exhibit higher satisfaction with labeling policies, they show lower satisfaction with safety and redress policies. The presence of a conservative government is associated with higher satisfaction in specific policy areas but lower overall satisfaction. Changes in political orientation significantly influence policy satisfaction, with shifts away from conservatism and towards liberalism leading to decreased satisfaction. The findings highlight the importance of understanding the nuanced preferences of different political groups and the need for responsive and transparent food policy frameworks. This study advances the theoretical understanding of the political economy of policy satisfaction and provides novel policy implications for effective governance.