# Electromechanical efficiency index of skeletal muscle and its applicability: a systematic review

## TL;DR

This systematic review explores the electromechanical efficiency index of skeletal muscle, its measurement methods, and its applications in clinical and sports contexts.

## Contribution

The paper provides a systematic review and integration of existing research on electromechanical efficiency index measurement methods and applications.

## Key findings

- The electromechanical efficiency index has been used to assess muscle conditions like atrophy and pain syndromes.
- Tensiomyography is a reliable method for measuring the index but cannot be used during voluntary muscle contractions.

## Abstract

Introduction: The electromechanical efficiency of skeletal muscle represents the dissociation between electrical and mechanical events within a muscle. It has been widely studied, with varying methods for its measurement and calculation. For this reason, the purpose of this literature review was to integrate the available research to date and provide more insights about this measure.

Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed across three online databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and SPORTDiscus. This yielded 1284 reports, of which 10 met the inclusion criteria. Included studies have used different methods to measure the electromechanical efficiency (EME) index, including electromyography (EMG), mechanomyography and tensiomyography (TMG).

Results: The EME index was used to assess muscle conditions such as muscle atrophy, pain syndromes, or to monitor rehabilitation in patients with knee problems, fatigue and the effects of exercise and rehabilitation. TMG has been shown to be one of the most reliable methods to obtain the EME index, but its use precludes obtaining the index during voluntary muscle contractions.

Conclusion: Standardizing the EME index is crucial for its diverse applications in clinical, sport, and rehabilitation contexts. Future research should prioritize standardization of measurement protocols for establishing the most repeatable, and reliable approach that can be used for inter-individual comparisons or for assessing an individual for multiple times over a longer period.

Systematic Review Registration:
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023440333 Identifier: CRD42023440333.