# Humanising research on (non-)migration decision-making: a situated framework

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a new framework for studying migration decisions that emphasizes the human aspects often overlooked by traditional theories.

## Contribution

The paper proposes a situated framework that humanizes migration research by incorporating context, life dimensions, and time.

## Key findings

- The framework highlights the importance of thick contextualisation in understanding migration decisions.
- It advocates for a life dimensions-focused analysis to capture the complexity of individuals' experiences.
- The paper calls for methodologies that are both gender-sensitive and decolonized.

## Abstract

Recent global challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic, economic crises, and wars have not impeded transnational migration to continuously unfold. The question of why some people migrate while others choose to stay remains one of the important preoccupations in migration studies. It underlines the need to further conceptualise transnational migration to identify the drivers behind individuals’ aspiration or intention to (re)migrate or stay where they are. Drawing from several migration theories and perspectives in various disciplines, this paper proposes the situated framework of “humanising research on (non-)migration decision-making”, that is, highlighting its human aspects. This scholarly enterprise is critically important as mainstream migration theories put more emphasis on individuals’ rationality, thereby overlooking other human aspects of migration and stasis. Viewing individuals as persons, this framework offers three ways to humanise the analysis: thick contextualisation, life dimensions-focused analysis, and time-situated inquiry. It also calls for the engendering of the analysis and decolonising the methodologies adopted in the study of (non-)migration decision-making.