Response of beech and fir to different light intensities along the Carpathian and Dinaric Mountains
Matjaž Čater, Pia Caroline Adamič, Eva Dařenova

TL;DR
This study examines how beech and fir trees respond to different light intensities in the Carpathian and Dinaric Mountains, linking their physiological responses to climate change.
Contribution
The study provides detailed ecophysiological data on beech and fir responses to light and climate across a latitudinal gradient in southeastern Europe.
Findings
Beech and fir showed varying maximum quantum yield (Φ) responses to light intensity and temperature across the Carpathian and Dinaric Mountains.
Short-term physiological responses of the trees were consistent with long-term radial growth observations.
The results suggest future climate change could affect the competitiveness and distribution of beech and fir in these regions.
Abstract
Predicting global change mitigations based on environmental variables, like temperature and water availability, although yielding insightful hypothesis still lacks the integration of environmental responses. Physiological limits should be assessed to obtain a complete representation of a species’ fundamental niche. Detailed ecophysiological studies on the response of trees along the latitudinal gradient are rare. They could shed light on the behaviour under different light intensities and other studied traits. The forests of the Dinaric Mountains and the Carpathians represent the largest contiguous forest complexes in south-eastern Europe. In uneven-aged Carpathian (8 plots) and Dinaric Mountain (11 plots) forests, net assimilation (Amax) and maximum quantum yield (Φ) were measured for beech and fir in three predefined light intensity categories according to the indirect site factor…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPublic Health and Nutrition · Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction · Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
