# Ophthalmomyiasis Case Caused by Two Blow Fly (Diptera: Calliphoridae) Species in North America

**Authors:** Taylor B. Parker, Kelly A. Meiklejohn, Gregory A. Dahlem, Ralph C. Eagle, Marius J. Heersink

PMC · DOI: 10.1155/2024/2209301 · The Scientific World Journal · 2024-05-14

## TL;DR

A rare case of eye infection caused by two types of blow flies was reported in North America, highlighting unusual larval behavior.

## Contribution

This is the first documented case of ophthalmomyiasis caused by two blow fly species in a single individual.

## Key findings

- DNA analysis identified Lucilia coeruleiviridis and Phormia regina as the two blow fly species involved.
- Morphological examination confirmed only Lucilia coeruleiviridis.
- This case suggests competitive behavior among blow fly species in unusual ecological conditions.

## Abstract

Ophthalmomyiasis is the result of fly larvae feeding on the tissues of the eye. Commonly associated with poor hygiene and open wounds, this condition is rare and often stigmatized. Treatment can be straightforward, and full recovery is common. Identifying the species responsible for ophthalmomyiasis is important for the medical, forensic, and entomological communities. Here, we present a case of ophthalmomyiasis where 30–40 blow fly (Diptera: Calliphoridae) larvae were removed from the eye of a human male. A representative subsample of five larvae was used for taxonomic identification via two approaches (a) DNA analysis, via sequencing of the complete mitochondrial genome (mtGenome) and comparison of the mtGenome and mitochondrial COI barcode region to GenBank, and (b) morphology, examination of the posterior spiracles using microscopy, and comparison to published larval descriptions of blow flies. Two species of blow flies were identified from the DNA analysis: Lucilia coeruleiviridis and Phormia regina. Morphological examination could only confirm L. coeruleiviridis as being present. To our knowledge, finding two blow fly species causing ophthalmomyiasis in a single individual has not been previously reported in the scientific literature. Neither P. regina nor L. coeruleiviridis prefers living tissue for larva development, but since they fill similar ecological niches, perhaps this was a show of competition rather than a normal feeding habit. Knowing these blow fly species can resort to this behavior, and that it can affect human populations, is valuable to the education of patients and providers.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** ophthalmomyiasis (MONDO:0000301)
- **Species:** Lucilia coeruleiviridis (taxon 376218), Phormia regina (taxon 7380)

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Lucilia coeruleiviridis (species) [taxon 376218], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly, species) [taxon 7227], Diptera (flies, order) [taxon 7147], Phormia regina (black blowfly, species) [taxon 7380], Calliphoridae (blow flies, family) [taxon 7371]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11108687/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11108687/full.md

## References

24 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11108687/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11108687