# Assessing the impact of CHARM2, a family planning program on gender attitudes, intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and marital quality in India

**Authors:** Sangeeta Chatterji, Nicole E. Johns, Mohan Ghule, Shahina Begum, Sarah Averbach, Madhusudana Battala, Anita Raj, Adriana Andrea Ewurabena Biney, Adriana Andrea Ewurabena Biney

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003220 · PLOS Global Public Health · 2024-05-21

## TL;DR

A program in India to promote gender equity and family planning reduced acceptance of violence and improved men's attitudes and marital quality.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates the impact of a gender equity intervention on men's and women's attitudes and marital quality in rural India.

## Key findings

- Men and women in the intervention group were less likely to accept physical intimate partner violence.
- Men in the intervention group showed more gender-equitable attitudes and higher marital quality.
- No effects were found on women's experiences of violence or reproductive coercion.

## Abstract

Using a two-armed cluster randomised controlled trial, CHARM2 (Counselling Husbands to Achieve Reproductive health and Marital equity), a 5-session gender equity and family planning intervention for couples in rural India, showed an impact on family planning outcomes in primary trial analyses. This study examines its effects on gender-equitable attitudes, intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and marital quality. We used multilevel mixed-effects models to assess the intervention impact on each outcome. Both male (aIRR at 9 months: 0.64, C.I.: 0.45,0.90; aIRR at 18 months: 0.25, C.I.: 0.18,0.39) and female (aIRR at 9 months: 0.57, C.I.: 0.46,0.71; aIRR at 18 months: 0.38, C.I.: 0.23,0.61) intervention participants were less likely than corresponding control participants to endorse attitudes accepting physical IPV at 9- and 18-month follow-ups. Men in the intervention, compared to those in the control condition, reported more gender-equitable attitudes at 9- and 18 months (ß at 9 months: 0.13, C.I.: 0.06,0.20; ß at 18 months: 0.26, C.I.: 0.19,0.34) and higher marital quality at the 18-month follow-up (ß: 0.03, C.I.: 0.01,0.05). However, we found no effects on women’s experiences of IPV, reproductive coercion, or marital quality. CHARM2 shows promise in improving men’s and women’s attitudes towards gender equality and male perceptions of marital quality. Still, IPV and reproductive coercion reductions may require more intensive programming than that provided within this 5-session model focused on family planning.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** physical IPV (MESH:D059445), intimate partner violence (MESH:C563733), reproductive coercion (MESH:D060737)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11108161/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11108161/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11108161/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11108161