# Extended dosing (12 cycles) vs conventional dosing (6 cycles) of adjuvant temozolomide in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas: a randomized, single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group controlled trial

**Authors:** Kazem Anvari, Mehdi Seilanian Toussi, Mohammadreza Saghafi, Seyed Alireza Javadinia, Hamidreza Saghafi, James S. Welsh

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1357789 · Frontiers in Oncology · 2024-05-07

## TL;DR

This study found that extending temozolomide chemotherapy from 6 to 12 cycles does not improve survival in patients with high-grade gliomas.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence against the benefit of extended temozolomide cycles in high-grade glioma treatment.

## Key findings

- Extended temozolomide (12 cycles) did not significantly improve overall survival compared to 6 cycles.
- The 6-cycle group had a median overall survival of 35 months versus 23 months for the 12-cycle group.
- Progression-free survival was similar between the two treatment groups.

## Abstract

Maximum safe surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiation and temozolomide chemotherapy is the current standard of care in the management of newly diagnosed high grade glioma. However, there are controversies about the optimal number of adjuvant temozolomide cycles. This study aimed to compare the survival benefits of 12 cycles against 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide adults with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas.

Adult patients with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas, and a Karnofsky performance status>60%, were randomized to receive either 6 cycles or 12 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. Patients were followed-up for assessment of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by brain MRI every 3 months within the first year after treatment and then every six months.

A total of 100 patients (6 cycles, 50; 12 cycles, 50) were entered. The rate of treatment completion in 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 91.3% and 55.1%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 26 months, the 12-, 24-, 36-, and 48-month OS rates in 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 81.3% vs 78.8%, 58.3% vs 49.8%, 47.6% vs 34.1%, and 47.6% vs 31.5%, respectively (p-value=.19). Median OS of 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 35 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 11.0 to 58.9) and 23 months (95%CI, 16.9 to 29.0). The 12-, 24-, 36-, and 48- month PFS rates in 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 70.8% vs 56.9%, 39.5% and 32.7%, 27.1% vs 28.8%, and 21.1% vs 28.8%, respectively (p=.88). The Median PFS of 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups was 18 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 21.1) and 16 (95% CI, 11.0 to 20.9) months.

Patients with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas treated with adjuvant temozolomide after maximum safe surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation do not benefit from extended adjuvant temozolomide beyond 6 cycles.

Prospectively registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials: IRCT20160706028815N3. Date registered: 18/03/14.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** temozolomide (PubChem CID 5394)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** glioma (MESH:D005910)
- **Chemicals:** temozolomide (MESH:D000077204)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11106464/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11106464/full.md

## References

28 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11106464/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11106464